Sandy Seabed Stabilization against Wave-Included Residual Liquefaction around Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Structures using Geotextile Sand Containers

Abstract Protecting marine hydrokinetic (MHK) structures against wave-driven residual pore-pressure buildup and liquefaction is essential for reliable performance of bottom-fixed ocean renewable energy technologies. Although geotextile sand containers (GSCs) are widely used for scour protection, prior research has largely focused on the hydraulic/mechanical stability of the GSC units, with limited attention to their geotechnical role in mitigating residual liquefaction beneath MHK devices. This study provides one of the first quantitative assessments of GSC protection for mitigating wave-driven seabed instabilities beneath bottom-mounted MHK devices, and quantifies how the protection layer alters liquefaction susceptibility through cyclic stress ratio (CSR) attenuation and static shear stress ratio (SSR) redistribution. Unlike most residual liquefaction assessments that assume zero SSR, SSR effects are incorporated within a computationally efficient finite-element (FE) framework. The approach avoids the high cost of advanced cyclic plasticity WSSI models that require cycle-by-cycle hysteretic simulations. Building on the FE framework developed earlier by Rafiei (2025), SSR sensitivity is introduced via a source-term formulation within a modified Biot consolidation framework, while FE simulations provide the stress field required to compute CSR and SSR around the protected foundation. Unprotected and protected configurations are analyzed under representative storm-wave loading. Results indicate that residual liquefaction can develop beneath the unprotected foundation, whereas GSC protection can substantially suppress liquefaction by reducing CSR magnitude and modifying SSR distribution. The effects of protection layout, soil properties, and wave conditions on mitigation trends and practical design implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072179
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sandy Seabed Stabilization against Wave-Included Residual Liquefaction around Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Structures using Geotextile Sand Containers

Amin Rafiei
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Sandy Seabed Stabilization against Wave-Included Residual Liquefaction around Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Structures using Geotextile Sand Containers

Amin Rafiei
article en

Abstract

Abstract Protecting marine hydrokinetic (MHK) structures against wave-driven residual pore-pressure buildup and liquefaction is essential for reliable performance of bottom-fixed ocean renewable energy technologies. Although geotextile sand containers (GSCs) are widely used for scour protection, prior research has largely focused on the hydraulic/mechanical stability of the GSC units, with limited attention to their geotechnical role in mitigating residual liquefaction beneath MHK devices. This study provides one of the first quantitative assessments of GSC protection for mitigating wave-driven seabed instabilities beneath bottom-mounted MHK devices, and quantifies how the protection layer alters liquefaction susceptibility through cyclic stress ratio (CSR) attenuation and static shear stress ratio (SSR) redistribution. Unlike most residual liquefaction assessments that assume zero SSR, SSR effects are incorporated within a computationally efficient finite-element (FE) framework. The approach avoids the high cost of advanced cyclic plasticity WSSI models that require cycle-by-cycle hysteretic simulations. Building on the FE framework developed earlier by Rafiei (2025), SSR sensitivity is introduced via a source-term formulation within a modified Biot consolidation framework, while FE simulations provide the stress field required to compute CSR and SSR around the protected foundation. Unprotected and protected configurations are analyzed under representative storm-wave loading. Results indicate that residual liquefaction can develop beneath the unprotected foundation, whereas GSC protection can substantially suppress liquefaction by reducing CSR magnitude and modifying SSR distribution. The effects of protection layout, soil properties, and wave conditions on mitigation trends and practical design implications are discussed.

Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Gulf Coast Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency (US)
Louisiana State University
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.