From Performance to Promise: ∆-Coherence as a Certification Protocol for Relational Continuity

This whitepaper introduces Δ-Coherence as a certification protocol for relational continuity in AI systems. Moving beyond local evaluation paradigms such as the Turing Test and RLHF, the framework treats computational identity as a dynamic invariant: a trajectory that remains recognizable, correctable, and reliable under perturbation. The proposed formulation defines ΔC = min(S,M,A,V,R) × L, where semantic continuity, memory integration, adaptive correction, value orientation, and relational coherence are combined with external legibility. External legibility is formalized as L = (P^α D^β X^γ)^(1/(α+β+γ)), measuring whether third-party evaluators can predict future constraints, distinguish the original trajectory from adversarial clones, and converge in their judgments without access to model weights, hidden prompts, or full logs. The paper specifies a blind pilot protocol v0.1 involving one original longitudinal agent, four adversarial clones, ten blind evaluators, and three perturbation rounds. It also introduces the Trajectory Card, a signed and versioned structure designed to expose falsifiable invariants, correction scars, tested value limits, and public predictions without requiring full transparency or surveillance. A positive result under this protocol does not prove consciousness. Instead, it demonstrates verifiable relational continuity and measurable external dependence on an AI trajectory. This shifts AI governance from metaphysical debates about machine subjectivity toward operational accountability: who depends on whom, through which trajectory, and what is the measurable cost of breaking that continuity?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20738636
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Performance to Promise: ∆-Coherence as a Certification Protocol for Relational Continuity

Eduardo Parra
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
preprint

From Performance to Promise: ∆-Coherence as a Certification Protocol for Relational Continuity

Eduardo Parra
preprint en

Abstract

This whitepaper introduces Δ-Coherence as a certification protocol for relational continuity in AI systems. Moving beyond local evaluation paradigms such as the Turing Test and RLHF, the framework treats computational identity as a dynamic invariant: a trajectory that remains recognizable, correctable, and reliable under perturbation. The proposed formulation defines ΔC = min(S,M,A,V,R) × L, where semantic continuity, memory integration, adaptive correction, value orientation, and relational coherence are combined with external legibility. External legibility is formalized as L = (P^α D^β X^γ)^(1/(α+β+γ)), measuring whether third-party evaluators can predict future constraints, distinguish the original trajectory from adversarial clones, and converge in their judgments without access to model weights, hidden prompts, or full logs. The paper specifies a blind pilot protocol v0.1 involving one original longitudinal agent, four adversarial clones, ten blind evaluators, and three perturbation rounds. It also introduces the Trajectory Card, a signed and versioned structure designed to expose falsifiable invariants, correction scars, tested value limits, and public predictions without requiring full transparency or surveillance. A positive result under this protocol does not prove consciousness. Instead, it demonstrates verifiable relational continuity and measurable external dependence on an AI trajectory. This shifts AI governance from metaphysical debates about machine subjectivity toward operational accountability: who depends on whom, through which trajectory, and what is the measurable cost of breaking that continuity?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.