Lost in translation: Justice and rights in South Africa’s many languages

This introductory article provides an overview of the special issue on how language influences conceptions of justice and rights in South Africa. Foregrounding indigenous languages reveals the limitations of English legal concepts, including cultural differences, semantic issues of translation, and the continuities of colonial legacies. Accordingly, our threefold objectives in producing this special issue were: firstly, to explore the dissonance between liberal-constitutional notions of justice and indigenous understandings rooted in local languages and cultures, such as isiZulu, isiXhosa, Sesotho, and others; secondly, to show how legal concepts like rights and justice are often (mis-)translated from oral, cultural, and linguistic contexts into English, resulting in a loss of meaning and perpetuating colonial-apartheid logics and third, to address the exclusion of indigenous perspectives from formal legal discourse, and how re-centring these perspectives can lead to a more inclusive, culturally grounded understanding of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal on Human Rights
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2026.2639160
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in translation: Justice and rights in South Africa’s many languages

Jeff Handmaker, Sindiso Mnisi
South African Journal on Human Rights
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

Lost in translation: Justice and rights in South Africa’s many languages

Jeff Handmaker, Sindiso Mnisi
article en

Abstract

This introductory article provides an overview of the special issue on how language influences conceptions of justice and rights in South Africa. Foregrounding indigenous languages reveals the limitations of English legal concepts, including cultural differences, semantic issues of translation, and the continuities of colonial legacies. Accordingly, our threefold objectives in producing this special issue were: firstly, to explore the dissonance between liberal-constitutional notions of justice and indigenous understandings rooted in local languages and cultures, such as isiZulu, isiXhosa, Sesotho, and others; secondly, to show how legal concepts like rights and justice are often (mis-)translated from oral, cultural, and linguistic contexts into English, resulting in a loss of meaning and perpetuating colonial-apartheid logics and third, to address the exclusion of indigenous perspectives from formal legal discourse, and how re-centring these perspectives can lead to a more inclusive, culturally grounded understanding of justice.

South African Journal on Human Rights
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.