Between protection and violation: An analysis of gender, coloniality and race in UN peacekeeping sexual exploitation and abuse

The United Nations has long positioned itself as a global leader in ending gender-based violence. However, its peacekeeping missions have been repeatedly implicated in sexual exploitation and abuse against the very populations they were deployed to protect. Using the Democratic Republic of Congo as a case study, this paper argues that peacekeeper-perpetrated sexual exploitation and abuse are not isolated acts of misconduct but reflect deeper structures of inequality. It examines the blurred boundaries between security and humanitarianism in conflict zones, arguing that peacekeeping missions also function as political sites of power where women are positioned as paradoxical subjects of both protection and violation. Drawing on critical race theory, this paper also highlights how survivors are positioned as hyper-visible objects of exploitation but invisible as victims, demonstrating how systems intended to protect actively reproduces harm. It calls for accountability frameworks that move beyond performative compliance to strengthening survivors’ access to justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261460171
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between protection and violation: An analysis of gender, coloniality and race in UN peacekeeping sexual exploitation and abuse

Yemisi Sloane
Social & Legal Studies
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Between protection and violation: An analysis of gender, coloniality and race in UN peacekeeping sexual exploitation and abuse

Yemisi Sloane
article en

Abstract

The United Nations has long positioned itself as a global leader in ending gender-based violence. However, its peacekeeping missions have been repeatedly implicated in sexual exploitation and abuse against the very populations they were deployed to protect. Using the Democratic Republic of Congo as a case study, this paper argues that peacekeeper-perpetrated sexual exploitation and abuse are not isolated acts of misconduct but reflect deeper structures of inequality. It examines the blurred boundaries between security and humanitarianism in conflict zones, arguing that peacekeeping missions also function as political sites of power where women are positioned as paradoxical subjects of both protection and violation. Drawing on critical race theory, this paper also highlights how survivors are positioned as hyper-visible objects of exploitation but invisible as victims, demonstrating how systems intended to protect actively reproduces harm. It calls for accountability frameworks that move beyond performative compliance to strengthening survivors’ access to justice.

Social & Legal Studies
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between protection and violation: An analysis of gender, coloniality and race in UN peacekeeping sexual exploitation and abuse — Yemisi Sloane · Social & Legal Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS