Validating the Factor Structure of the Fujisawa Social Capital Scale (FSCS) Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Participating in “Kayoi-no-ba”: The Gunma Aging Cohort Study

Social capital is a fundamental social determinant of health for older adults in rapidly aging societies; however, existing comprehensive instruments often impose high cognitive friction through complex recall tasks, potentially leading to systematically excluding vulnerable populations. This study validated the factor structure of the Fujisawa Social Capital Scale (FSCS) - an independent, brief tool designed for inclusive community-based practice - among community-dwelling Japanese older adults participating in "Kayoi-no-ba" (neighborhood social participation hubs). Data were analyzed from 587 participants in the Gunma Aging Cohort (mean age 79.2 ± 6.0 years; 87.1% female; 29.6% living alone). Exploratory factor analysis using the Weighted Least Squares Mean- and Variance-adjusted estimator was prioritized to ensure statistical stability for this specific cohort. A robust two-factor structure emerged: Factor 1, "Sense of Security and Attachment to the Community," and Factor 2, "Mutual Aid Among Neighbors." These findings underscore the conceptual distinction between psychological belonging and functional support within community settings. The model demonstrated favorable fit indices, with a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation of 0.071 and a Tucker-Lewis Index of 0.96. High internal consistency was confirmed using McDonald's omega (ω) for the total scale (ωt = 0.85), Factor 1 (ω = 0.77), and Factor 2 (ω = 0.74). Overall, these results indicate that the FSCS is a "practice-first" instrument that minimizes respondent burden while maintaining data reliability. By distinguishing psychological attachment from functional support, it provides a "common language" for interdisciplinary teams to guide social prescribing and prioritize targeted community-based support for socially vulnerable older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Work in Public Health
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2026.2689953
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the Factor Structure of the Fujisawa Social Capital Scale (FSCS) Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Participating in “Kayoi-no-ba”: The Gunma Aging Cohort Study

Daisuke Higuchi, Yuta Takahashi, Tomoyuki Shinohara, Sayaka Nagao-Sato et al.
Social Work in Public Health
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Validating the Factor Structure of the Fujisawa Social Capital Scale (FSCS) Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Participating in “Kayoi-no-ba”: The Gunma Aging Cohort Study

Daisuke Higuchi, Yuta Takahashi, Tomoyuki Shinohara, Sayaka Nagao-Sato, Mari Takeuchi
article en

Abstract

Social capital is a fundamental social determinant of health for older adults in rapidly aging societies; however, existing comprehensive instruments often impose high cognitive friction through complex recall tasks, potentially leading to systematically excluding vulnerable populations. This study validated the factor structure of the Fujisawa Social Capital Scale (FSCS) - an independent, brief tool designed for inclusive community-based practice - among community-dwelling Japanese older adults participating in "Kayoi-no-ba" (neighborhood social participation hubs). Data were analyzed from 587 participants in the Gunma Aging Cohort (mean age 79.2 ± 6.0 years; 87.1% female; 29.6% living alone). Exploratory factor analysis using the Weighted Least Squares Mean- and Variance-adjusted estimator was prioritized to ensure statistical stability for this specific cohort. A robust two-factor structure emerged: Factor 1, "Sense of Security and Attachment to the Community," and Factor 2, "Mutual Aid Among Neighbors." These findings underscore the conceptual distinction between psychological belonging and functional support within community settings. The model demonstrated favorable fit indices, with a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation of 0.071 and a Tucker-Lewis Index of 0.96. High internal consistency was confirmed using McDonald's omega (ω) for the total scale (ωt = 0.85), Factor 1 (ω = 0.77), and Factor 2 (ω = 0.74). Overall, these results indicate that the FSCS is a "practice-first" instrument that minimizes respondent burden while maintaining data reliability. By distinguishing psychological attachment from functional support, it provides a "common language" for interdisciplinary teams to guide social prescribing and prioritize targeted community-based support for socially vulnerable older adults.

Social Work in Public Health
Takasaki University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.