Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Correctional Staff: Results of a National Survey

Incarcerated people are more likely to become ill from foodborne disease outbreaks compared with the general public. Correctional settings face unique challenges when preventing, controlling, and mitigating foodborne outbreaks. To describe knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of correctional staff regarding food safety, food safety training, and barriers to food safety in their facilities, we conducted an anonymous survey of correctional staff through professional organizations and correctional employers throughout the United States. Participants' food safety KAP was compared by individual and facility characteristics using descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Chi-squared statistics indicate respondents from smaller facilities more frequently reported having confidence in preventing foodborne illness than those in medium and large facilities. Food service staff (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.9, 95% CI: [3.4-28.8]) and respondents who reported receiving food safety training (aOR = 2.9, 95% CI: [1.7-5.0]) were more likely to report higher confidence in preventing foodborne illness, controlling for other facility and respondent characteristics. Our data suggest that training, smaller facility size, and working in food service are associated with positive attitudes and self-efficacy related to food safety. Food safety training of all correctional staff is an important piece of preventing foodborne illness in correctional facilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Correctional Health Care
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10783458261453787
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Correctional Staff: Results of a National Survey

Naomi A. Drexler, Adora Nsonwu, Adam Kramer, L Hagan et al.
Journal of Correctional Health Care
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Correctional Staff: Results of a National Survey

Naomi A. Drexler, Adora Nsonwu, Adam Kramer, L Hagan, Marisa Hast, Hilary Whitham, Beth Wittry
article en

Abstract

Incarcerated people are more likely to become ill from foodborne disease outbreaks compared with the general public. Correctional settings face unique challenges when preventing, controlling, and mitigating foodborne outbreaks. To describe knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of correctional staff regarding food safety, food safety training, and barriers to food safety in their facilities, we conducted an anonymous survey of correctional staff through professional organizations and correctional employers throughout the United States. Participants' food safety KAP was compared by individual and facility characteristics using descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Chi-squared statistics indicate respondents from smaller facilities more frequently reported having confidence in preventing foodborne illness than those in medium and large facilities. Food service staff (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.9, 95% CI: [3.4-28.8]) and respondents who reported receiving food safety training (aOR = 2.9, 95% CI: [1.7-5.0]) were more likely to report higher confidence in preventing foodborne illness, controlling for other facility and respondent characteristics. Our data suggest that training, smaller facility size, and working in food service are associated with positive attitudes and self-efficacy related to food safety. Food safety training of all correctional staff is an important piece of preventing foodborne illness in correctional facilities.

Journal of Correctional Health Care
Office of Readiness and Response (US), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.