Fitness, Protein, and Food Outlet Choice

ABSTRACT US fitness trends and rising interest in protein have underexplored economic implications. This study evaluates how consumers' fitness orientation relates to their allocation of meals across food outlets and to within‐outlet preferences for protein sources. Prior studies document higher willingness‐to‐pay and reduced price sensitivity for protein among fitness‐oriented consumers, but do not examine where these consumers source meals or which proteins they prefer. Addressing this gap is important for targeted strategies by food retailers and foodservice establishments seeking to respond to societal trends. We use prior‐day meal reporting from a large consumer survey to estimate random parameters logit models of food outlet choice. The models allow outlet choice to vary across meal occasions and for protein sources to contribute different levels of utility to a meal. Split‐sample estimation permits analysis of heterogeneity by consumers' fitness orientation, defined here as respondents who report intentionally consuming protein to aid fitness‐related goals. Fitness‐oriented consumers source fewer meals from physical retail outlets (e.g., grocery stores and supermarkets) and more from foodservice establishments (i.e., restaurants), especially at lunch and dinner, and have a 13.9 percentage point higher probability of skipping dinner than other consumers. Within outlets, fitness‐oriented consumers exhibit selective protein preferences where whole cuts and simple preparations of beef and whole cuts of chicken rank highest, while pork often provides low or negative utility. These results can inform demand forecasts and targeted product positioning across meal occasions and outlet channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70119
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fitness, Protein, and Food Outlet Choice

Glynn T. Tonsor, Justin D. Bina
Agribusiness
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Fitness, Protein, and Food Outlet Choice

Glynn T. Tonsor, Justin D. Bina
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT US fitness trends and rising interest in protein have underexplored economic implications. This study evaluates how consumers' fitness orientation relates to their allocation of meals across food outlets and to within‐outlet preferences for protein sources. Prior studies document higher willingness‐to‐pay and reduced price sensitivity for protein among fitness‐oriented consumers, but do not examine where these consumers source meals or which proteins they prefer. Addressing this gap is important for targeted strategies by food retailers and foodservice establishments seeking to respond to societal trends. We use prior‐day meal reporting from a large consumer survey to estimate random parameters logit models of food outlet choice. The models allow outlet choice to vary across meal occasions and for protein sources to contribute different levels of utility to a meal. Split‐sample estimation permits analysis of heterogeneity by consumers' fitness orientation, defined here as respondents who report intentionally consuming protein to aid fitness‐related goals. Fitness‐oriented consumers source fewer meals from physical retail outlets (e.g., grocery stores and supermarkets) and more from foodservice establishments (i.e., restaurants), especially at lunch and dinner, and have a 13.9 percentage point higher probability of skipping dinner than other consumers. Within outlets, fitness‐oriented consumers exhibit selective protein preferences where whole cuts and simple preparations of beef and whole cuts of chicken rank highest, while pork often provides low or negative utility. These results can inform demand forecasts and targeted product positioning across meal occasions and outlet channels.

Agribusiness
Kansas State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.