Clinical and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes from Southern Osseointegrated Fixtures for Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

This study reports the clinical outcomes from using Southern osseointegrated fixtures (SOFs) for retention of auricular, nasal, and orbital silicone prosthetics. Osseointegrated implants are widely used in the craniofacial skeleton, but data specific to the use of SOFs are more limited. A retrospective review was conducted of 16 patients who underwent implantation of SOFs between 2013 and 2024 at a large London teaching hospital. Data were collected from Electronic Patient Records and post-implantation surveys to assess patient satisfaction, prosthesis use, and complication rates. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to evaluate implant success, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS). A total of 58 implants were reviewed, with an average follow-up of 56 months. Implant retention was 82.76%; 10 implants failed to osseointegrate, predominantly in patients treated with radiotherapy to the underlying bone. The most common complications were over-granulation (8 implants), abutment or superstructure loosening (5 implants), and infection (4 implants). Of the 10 patients who completed a satisfaction survey, 8 were wearing at least one prosthesis daily, and all reported that their prosthetics were highly stable with an average satisfaction score of 4.88/5. Aesthetic outcomes were also high at 4.63/5. In this cohort, SOFs provided stable and effective fixation for craniofacial prosthetics, resulting in high patient satisfaction. Complications were generally infrequent and manageable, although implant failure in irradiated bone remains problematic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013028
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes from Southern Osseointegrated Fixtures for Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

Morgan Marshall, Jack Brown, Yazan Al-Ajam, Norbert Kang et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
article

Clinical and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes from Southern Osseointegrated Fixtures for Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

Morgan Marshall, Jack Brown, Yazan Al-Ajam, Norbert Kang, Sara Moeini, Alexander Zargaran, Alex Woollard
article en

Abstract

This study reports the clinical outcomes from using Southern osseointegrated fixtures (SOFs) for retention of auricular, nasal, and orbital silicone prosthetics. Osseointegrated implants are widely used in the craniofacial skeleton, but data specific to the use of SOFs are more limited. A retrospective review was conducted of 16 patients who underwent implantation of SOFs between 2013 and 2024 at a large London teaching hospital. Data were collected from Electronic Patient Records and post-implantation surveys to assess patient satisfaction, prosthesis use, and complication rates. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to evaluate implant success, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS). A total of 58 implants were reviewed, with an average follow-up of 56 months. Implant retention was 82.76%; 10 implants failed to osseointegrate, predominantly in patients treated with radiotherapy to the underlying bone. The most common complications were over-granulation (8 implants), abutment or superstructure loosening (5 implants), and infection (4 implants). Of the 10 patients who completed a satisfaction survey, 8 were wearing at least one prosthesis daily, and all reported that their prosthetics were highly stable with an average satisfaction score of 4.88/5. Aesthetic outcomes were also high at 4.63/5. In this cohort, SOFs provided stable and effective fixation for craniofacial prosthetics, resulting in high patient satisfaction. Complications were generally infrequent and manageable, although implant failure in irradiated bone remains problematic.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
The Royal Free Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.