Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among African American Women With High Risk

Importance: Validating polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as a breast cancer (BC) risk stratification tool in high-risk clinical settings is essential for potential clinical implementation. Objective: To evaluate the performance of African-ancestry PRSs for overall BC and triple-negative BC (TNBC) in an independent African American cohort at elevated familial risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study was conducted among women with self-reported African ancestry in a clinical hereditary cancer genetic testing setting who had negative results for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in known BC-associated genes between 2016 to 2024. Analyses were performed from September 2025 to April 2026. Exposure: Six African-ancestry PRSs and a European-ancestry PRS (PRS-313). Main Outcomes and Measures: Performance of the PRSs was measured with covariate-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and adjusted odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD from logistic regression adjusting for age, top 10 genetic principal components, and family history. Results: This study included 31 522 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.3] years): 12 067 women with BC (2311 with TNBC) and 19 455 women unaffected by BC. Women unaffected by BC were younger at testing than women with BC at diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 42.1 [11.7] years vs 55.2 [11.8] years) and were more likely to report a first- and second-degree family history of BC than women with BC (14 524 women [74.7%] vs 6483 women [53.7%]). For overall BC, PRS-313 showed an AUC of 0.567 (95% CI, 0.560-0.574) and an OR of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.25-1.31) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC. In comparison, the African overall BC models 1 (2 324 063-variant model) and 2 (175 173-variant model) performed better, with AUCs of 0.588 (95% CI, 0.580-0.595) and 0.584 (95% CI, 0.576-0.591) and ORs of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.35-1.43) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.34-1.41) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC, respectively. Importantly, for TNBC, one 162-variant PRS consistently outperformed all other models, with an AUC of 0.609 (95% CI, 0.596-0.622) and an OR of 1.47 (95% CI, 1.40-1.55) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinically ascertained case-control study of self-reported Black or African American women, the PRSs demonstrated good performance among women with a strong family history of BC, reflecting populations in whom early PRS testing is most relevant. The high accuracy of the 162-variant TNBC PRS supported its potential as a cost-effective risk assessment tool to promote equitable care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.19285
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among African American Women With High Risk

Olopade Ol, Elisha Hughes, Armaan Jamal, Yijia Sun et al.
JAMA Network Open
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among African American Women With High Risk

Olopade Ol, Elisha Hughes, Armaan Jamal, Yijia Sun, Achille V.C. Manirakiza, James L. Li, Dmitry Pruss, Alexander Gutin, Sarah Ratzel, Timothy Simmons, Dezheng Huo
article en

Abstract

Importance: Validating polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as a breast cancer (BC) risk stratification tool in high-risk clinical settings is essential for potential clinical implementation. Objective: To evaluate the performance of African-ancestry PRSs for overall BC and triple-negative BC (TNBC) in an independent African American cohort at elevated familial risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study was conducted among women with self-reported African ancestry in a clinical hereditary cancer genetic testing setting who had negative results for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in known BC-associated genes between 2016 to 2024. Analyses were performed from September 2025 to April 2026. Exposure: Six African-ancestry PRSs and a European-ancestry PRS (PRS-313). Main Outcomes and Measures: Performance of the PRSs was measured with covariate-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and adjusted odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD from logistic regression adjusting for age, top 10 genetic principal components, and family history. Results: This study included 31 522 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.3] years): 12 067 women with BC (2311 with TNBC) and 19 455 women unaffected by BC. Women unaffected by BC were younger at testing than women with BC at diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 42.1 [11.7] years vs 55.2 [11.8] years) and were more likely to report a first- and second-degree family history of BC than women with BC (14 524 women [74.7%] vs 6483 women [53.7%]). For overall BC, PRS-313 showed an AUC of 0.567 (95% CI, 0.560-0.574) and an OR of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.25-1.31) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC. In comparison, the African overall BC models 1 (2 324 063-variant model) and 2 (175 173-variant model) performed better, with AUCs of 0.588 (95% CI, 0.580-0.595) and 0.584 (95% CI, 0.576-0.591) and ORs of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.35-1.43) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.34-1.41) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC, respectively. Importantly, for TNBC, one 162-variant PRS consistently outperformed all other models, with an AUC of 0.609 (95% CI, 0.596-0.622) and an OR of 1.47 (95% CI, 1.40-1.55) per 1 SD of individuals unaffected by BC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinically ascertained case-control study of self-reported Black or African American women, the PRSs demonstrated good performance among women with a strong family history of BC, reflecting populations in whom early PRS testing is most relevant. The high accuracy of the 162-variant TNBC PRS supported its potential as a cost-effective risk assessment tool to promote equitable care.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(6)
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of Chicago (US), Center for Innovation (US), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW), Myriad Genetics (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.