Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis

Importance: Prone positioning has been shown to improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation, but its clinical benefit in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support remains unknown. Objective: To investigate whether prone positioning in infants with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis and HFNC support reduces escalation to noninvasive or invasive ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial conducted in 15 pediatric intermediate or intensive care units in France. Infants aged 6 months or younger admitted for 24 hours or less with a diagnosis of acute bronchiolitis with moderate to severe respiratory distress requiring HFNC support were enrolled between January 2021 and November 2023 and followed up until hospital discharge (last patient discharged on December 11, 2023). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to the prone position (n = 221) or supine position (n = 230). Infants in the prone position group received prone positioning for 24 hours or longer during the first 48 hours. All participants received standardized HFNC support at 2 L/kg/min. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the need for escalation of care to noninvasive or invasive ventilation within the first 72 hours, according to prespecified criteria. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, determined by an independent clinical adjudication committee; tolerance of prone positioning; length of hospital stay; duration of respiratory support; infant comfort; and adverse events. Results: Among 451 infants randomized, 446 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 41 [IQR, 19-72] days; 54% male). Escalation of care occurred in 80 infants (17.9%), with no significant difference between the prone position (33/220 [15.0%]) and supine position (47/226 [20.8%]) groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.40-1.07]; P = .09). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the safety analysis, serious adverse events occurred in 2 of 180 infants (1.1%) in the prone position group and 2 of 264 (0.8%) in the supine position group. Conclusions and Relevance: Prone positioning in infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis receiving HFNC support did not significantly reduce escalation of care. However, the wide 95% confidence interval around the observed odds ratio suggests that this study was not definitive and further research is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03976895.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.11078
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis

Étienne Javouhey, Sylvain Renolleau, C Milesi, J. Chantreuil et al.
1 citations
JAMA
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
11.75
article

Prone Positioning in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis

Étienne Javouhey, Sylvain Renolleau, C Milesi, J. Chantreuil, Jean‐Eudes Piloquet, Marie Tochon, Robin Pouyau, Jérôme Rambaud, Sylvain Roche, Mickael Afanetti, Valérie Launay, Florent Baudin, Clemence Jarrasse, Fleur Cour Andlauer, A Portefaix, F Subtil, David Brossier, Corinne PAGET, Maxence FERNANDES, Michael Levy, PROPOSITIS Investigators, Megan Nallet Amate, Arnaud WIEDEMANN, Hugues PATURAL, Guillaume Mortamet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Importance: Prone positioning has been shown to improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation, but its clinical benefit in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support remains unknown. Objective: To investigate whether prone positioning in infants with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis and HFNC support reduces escalation to noninvasive or invasive ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial conducted in 15 pediatric intermediate or intensive care units in France. Infants aged 6 months or younger admitted for 24 hours or less with a diagnosis of acute bronchiolitis with moderate to severe respiratory distress requiring HFNC support were enrolled between January 2021 and November 2023 and followed up until hospital discharge (last patient discharged on December 11, 2023). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to the prone position (n = 221) or supine position (n = 230). Infants in the prone position group received prone positioning for 24 hours or longer during the first 48 hours. All participants received standardized HFNC support at 2 L/kg/min. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the need for escalation of care to noninvasive or invasive ventilation within the first 72 hours, according to prespecified criteria. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, determined by an independent clinical adjudication committee; tolerance of prone positioning; length of hospital stay; duration of respiratory support; infant comfort; and adverse events. Results: Among 451 infants randomized, 446 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 41 [IQR, 19-72] days; 54% male). Escalation of care occurred in 80 infants (17.9%), with no significant difference between the prone position (33/220 [15.0%]) and supine position (47/226 [20.8%]) groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.40-1.07]; P = .09). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the safety analysis, serious adverse events occurred in 2 of 180 infants (1.1%) in the prone position group and 2 of 264 (0.8%) in the supine position group. Conclusions and Relevance: Prone positioning in infants with moderate to severe bronchiolitis receiving HFNC support did not significantly reduce escalation of care. However, the wide 95% confidence interval around the observed odds ratio suggests that this study was not definitive and further research is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03976895.

JAMA
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant (FR), Hôpital Armand-Trousseau (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), VetAgro Sup (FR), Hôpital d'Enfants (FR), Hôpital Nord (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois (FR), Hôpital Mère-Enfant (FR), Fondation Lenval (FR), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR), Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve (FR), Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (FR), Pro Persona (NL), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
11.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.