Comparative effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors after myocardial infarction on dual antiplatelet therapy: Insights from a target trial emulation

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend co-prescribing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding. Emerging evidence indicates that PPIs have distinct pharmacokinetic profiles, and their cardiovascular and bleeding effects may not represent a class effect. METHODS: We used electronic health record data from the Tianjin Health and Medical Data Platform to emulate target trials comparing effectiveness and safety of three commonly used PPIs in clinical practice. The effectiveness outcome was gastrointestinal bleeding, and the safety outcome was composite cardiovascular events. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between individual PPIs. We further applied XGBoost-based prognostic models to assess treatment effect heterogeneity across strata of predicted baseline risk. RESULTS: Of 51 072 MI patients on DAPT, 22 671 were prescribed rabeprazole, 18 081 pantoprazole and 10 320 lansoprazole. During 1 year of follow-up, both pantoprazole (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97-1.13]) and lansoprazole (HR, 0.99 [0.91-1.09]) showed comparable cardiovascular risk to rabeprazole, but pantoprazole was associated with an increased risk of recurrent MI (HR, 1.20 [1.07-1.35]). For gastrointestinal bleeding risk, lansoprazole showed lower risk (HR, 0.81 [0.70-0.93]) compared with rabeprazole. Results were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses, and treatment effect heterogeneity showed gastrointestinal benefits of lansoprazole increase with the rising baseline bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute MI receiving DAPT, the three PPIs showed similar cardiovascular safety, while lansoprazole was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. External validation is warranted to examine these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70650
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors after myocardial infarction on dual antiplatelet therapy: Insights from a target trial emulation

Mark YY Chan, Doreen Su‐Yin Tan, Chengcheng Wu, Xin Zhou et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Comparative effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors after myocardial infarction on dual antiplatelet therapy: Insights from a target trial emulation

Mark YY Chan, Doreen Su‐Yin Tan, Chengcheng Wu, Xin Zhou, Hangkuan Liu, Li Li, Nicholas WS Chew, Z Zhang, Geru Aa, Xiaozhi Chen, Qing Yang, Liang Zhao, Pengfei Sun, Ching‐Hui Sia
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend co-prescribing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding. Emerging evidence indicates that PPIs have distinct pharmacokinetic profiles, and their cardiovascular and bleeding effects may not represent a class effect. METHODS: We used electronic health record data from the Tianjin Health and Medical Data Platform to emulate target trials comparing effectiveness and safety of three commonly used PPIs in clinical practice. The effectiveness outcome was gastrointestinal bleeding, and the safety outcome was composite cardiovascular events. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between individual PPIs. We further applied XGBoost-based prognostic models to assess treatment effect heterogeneity across strata of predicted baseline risk. RESULTS: Of 51 072 MI patients on DAPT, 22 671 were prescribed rabeprazole, 18 081 pantoprazole and 10 320 lansoprazole. During 1 year of follow-up, both pantoprazole (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97-1.13]) and lansoprazole (HR, 0.99 [0.91-1.09]) showed comparable cardiovascular risk to rabeprazole, but pantoprazole was associated with an increased risk of recurrent MI (HR, 1.20 [1.07-1.35]). For gastrointestinal bleeding risk, lansoprazole showed lower risk (HR, 0.81 [0.70-0.93]) compared with rabeprazole. Results were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses, and treatment effect heterogeneity showed gastrointestinal benefits of lansoprazole increase with the rising baseline bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute MI receiving DAPT, the three PPIs showed similar cardiovascular safety, while lansoprazole was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. External validation is warranted to examine these findings.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
National University of Singapore (SG), Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN), National University Heart Centre Singapore (SG), National University Health System (SG)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.