Land Use Intensity-Specific Characterization Factors to Assess the Biodiversity Impact of Different Livestock Systems Using Dung Beetles as a Bioindicator

Livestock intensification drives biodiversity loss, making impact quantification essential. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can evaluate whether regenerative practices, such as silvopastoral systems, mitigate this loss, but it requires specific characterization factors (CFs). In this pilot study, we applied the countryside Species-Area Relationship (SAR) model to derive the first invertebrate-specific CFs using dung beetles (Scarabaeinae). From field surveys, we calculated intensity-specific CFs for potential species loss (PSL/m2) in pastureland and cropland. We assessed biodiversity impacts per 1 kg calf live weight (LWC) across three livestock regimes: native silvopastoral (NSP, minimal land use), intensive silvopastoral (ISP, light land use), and monoculture (MC, intense land use). Results show high dung beetle affinity for NSP. The CFs distinguished impact intensity levels: MC had the highest PSL per area (6.76 × 10−10 PSL/m2), followed by ISP (5.93 × 10−10 PSL/m2) and NSP (4.99 × 10−10 PSL/m2). However, normalizing by yield reversed this trend: MC showed the lowest impact per 1 kg LWC (7.64 × 10−8 PSL/kg LWC), ISP was intermediate (1.06 × 10−7 PSL/kg LWC), and NSP had the highest impact (1.31 × 10−7 PSL/kg LWC). Incorporating upstream feed production significantly increased the overall biodiversity footprint, underscoring the need for comprehensive system boundaries. Integrating broader biodiversity components and landscape context remains essential to fully capture livestock management effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121338
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land Use Intensity-Specific Characterization Factors to Assess the Biodiversity Impact of Different Livestock Systems Using Dung Beetles as a Bioindicator

Adriana Rivera-Huerta, Francisco Galindo, María Salud Rubio Lozano, Federico Escobar et al.
Agriculture
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Land Use Intensity-Specific Characterization Factors to Assess the Biodiversity Impact of Different Livestock Systems Using Dung Beetles as a Bioindicator

Adriana Rivera-Huerta, Francisco Galindo, María Salud Rubio Lozano, Federico Escobar, Leonor Patricia Güereca
article en

Abstract

Livestock intensification drives biodiversity loss, making impact quantification essential. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can evaluate whether regenerative practices, such as silvopastoral systems, mitigate this loss, but it requires specific characterization factors (CFs). In this pilot study, we applied the countryside Species-Area Relationship (SAR) model to derive the first invertebrate-specific CFs using dung beetles (Scarabaeinae). From field surveys, we calculated intensity-specific CFs for potential species loss (PSL/m2) in pastureland and cropland. We assessed biodiversity impacts per 1 kg calf live weight (LWC) across three livestock regimes: native silvopastoral (NSP, minimal land use), intensive silvopastoral (ISP, light land use), and monoculture (MC, intense land use). Results show high dung beetle affinity for NSP. The CFs distinguished impact intensity levels: MC had the highest PSL per area (6.76 × 10−10 PSL/m2), followed by ISP (5.93 × 10−10 PSL/m2) and NSP (4.99 × 10−10 PSL/m2). However, normalizing by yield reversed this trend: MC showed the lowest impact per 1 kg LWC (7.64 × 10−8 PSL/kg LWC), ISP was intermediate (1.06 × 10−7 PSL/kg LWC), and NSP had the highest impact (1.31 × 10−7 PSL/kg LWC). Incorporating upstream feed production significantly increased the overall biodiversity footprint, underscoring the need for comprehensive system boundaries. Integrating broader biodiversity components and landscape context remains essential to fully capture livestock management effects.

AgricultureVol. 16(12)
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Instituto de Ecología (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.