Severity grading of cubital tunnel syndrome using diagnostic ultrasound

To investigate the diagnostic value of diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis and severity grading of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). A retrospective analysis, which does not constitute a prospective clinical trial and therefore did not require registration, was performed on data from patients diagnosed with and without CuTS during the same period. Differences in ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and ulnar nerve CSA/forearm nerve CSA (Ratio) were analyzed among patients with varying severity levels. The severity of CuTS was graded using the Gu classification system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of each parameter in diagnosing CuTS and determining its severity. The area under the curve (AUC) values for CSA and the Ratio in diagnosing normal individuals versus those with mild CuTS were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. For diagnosing mild-to-moderate CuTS, the AUC values were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. For diagnosing moderate-to-severe CuTS, the AUC values were 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. Diagnostic ultrasound parameters have strong discriminatory value in stratifying the severity of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), especially in the early stages of the disease. CSA & Ratio achieved excellent diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.96 and 0.98) for distinguishing normal controls from mild CuTS. These two ultrasound indices also showed good performance in differentiating mild‑to‑moderate (AUC = 0.83, 0.85) and moderate‑to‑severe CuTS (AUC = 0.77, 0.61). Based on ultrasound findings in this study, we propose a clinically practical CuTS severity grading scale corresponding to the Gu classification. Mild CuTS: CSA slightly increased, Ratio near normal range; mainly subjective symptoms, no obvious muscle atrophy. Moderate CuTS: CSA moderately enlarged, Ratio significantly changed; mild weakness, intermittent sensory loss. Severe CuTS: CSA markedly increased, Ratio distorted; persistent numbness, muscle atrophy, and impaired motor function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04658-5
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Severity grading of cubital tunnel syndrome using diagnostic ultrasound

Zizhao Ma, Yunhao Cai, 韩任伟, Jiahao Liu et al.
European journal of medical research
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Severity grading of cubital tunnel syndrome using diagnostic ultrasound

Zizhao Ma, Yunhao Cai, 韩任伟, Jiahao Liu, Yi-Xiang Wang, X Xu, Quanhao Dong, Peifeng Li
article en

Abstract

To investigate the diagnostic value of diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis and severity grading of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). A retrospective analysis, which does not constitute a prospective clinical trial and therefore did not require registration, was performed on data from patients diagnosed with and without CuTS during the same period. Differences in ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and ulnar nerve CSA/forearm nerve CSA (Ratio) were analyzed among patients with varying severity levels. The severity of CuTS was graded using the Gu classification system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of each parameter in diagnosing CuTS and determining its severity. The area under the curve (AUC) values for CSA and the Ratio in diagnosing normal individuals versus those with mild CuTS were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. For diagnosing mild-to-moderate CuTS, the AUC values were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. For diagnosing moderate-to-severe CuTS, the AUC values were 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. Diagnostic ultrasound parameters have strong discriminatory value in stratifying the severity of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), especially in the early stages of the disease. CSA & Ratio achieved excellent diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.96 and 0.98) for distinguishing normal controls from mild CuTS. These two ultrasound indices also showed good performance in differentiating mild‑to‑moderate (AUC = 0.83, 0.85) and moderate‑to‑severe CuTS (AUC = 0.77, 0.61). Based on ultrasound findings in this study, we propose a clinically practical CuTS severity grading scale corresponding to the Gu classification. Mild CuTS: CSA slightly increased, Ratio near normal range; mainly subjective symptoms, no obvious muscle atrophy. Moderate CuTS: CSA moderately enlarged, Ratio significantly changed; mild weakness, intermittent sensory loss. Severe CuTS: CSA markedly increased, Ratio distorted; persistent numbness, muscle atrophy, and impaired motor function.

European journal of medical research
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.