Outcomes of Posterolateral Fascial Reconstruction in Robot-Assisted Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy and Technique Description

Background/objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men over 60 years of age. The development of assisted robotic surgery has improved surgical performance across several variables in dynamic ways, introducing new reconstruction techniques. The present study aims to show differences between Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted prostatectomy vs. Retzius-sparing and posterolateral fascial reconstruction in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a 3-year time period by a single surgeon using the Da Vinci X platform. Two groups were assessed for the study, with and without posterolateral fascial reconstruction. Demographic data were analyzed with central tendency measures, and mean differences were calculated with the Mann–Whitney test and t-test, being significant if p < 0.05. Results: A total of 199 patients were included. The posterolateral reconstruction group had 81 patients, and outcomes saw similar performances to the non-reconstruction group. Urinary continence showed a positive trend of higher percentages in the first week after surgery but had similar results after one year, with no statistically significant differences. Oncologic results and sexual dysfunction showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusions: Posterolateral reconstruction combined with Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy demonstrated improved continence and was shown to be safe, without increasing overall complications such as bleeding.