Rethinking Sustainability Indicators for the Extractive Industry: A Multitechnique Statistical Approach

ABSTRACT The extractive industry faces increasing pressure to report sustainability performance measured through sustainability indicators (SI). Comprehensive sustainability reporting frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) contain nearly a hundred indicators that create reporting complexity and reduce comparability. Although existing research emphasizes context‐specific SI for emerging markets, few empirical studies identify relevant context‐specific SI. This study empirically derives a manageable set of SI for India's extractive industry from GRI's G4 framework. Data from reporting companies over 9 years were analyzed using three statistical techniques: multiple correspondence analysis, nonnegative matrix factorization, and cosine similarity analysis across economic, environmental, and social pillars. The analysis identified 27 SI (one‐third of the original list) that maintained parity with industry leaders. Back‐testing validated that no information was lost during reduction. This approach is scalable and replicable for other industries and geographies, making it a useful tool for sustainability researchers and practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71117
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Sustainability Indicators for the Extractive Industry: A Multitechnique Statistical Approach

Rahul Pramani, Neethu Mohammed, Kalyana C. Chejarla, Mahesh Balan
Business Strategy and the Environment
Mining and Resource Management
article

Rethinking Sustainability Indicators for the Extractive Industry: A Multitechnique Statistical Approach

Rahul Pramani, Neethu Mohammed, Kalyana C. Chejarla, Mahesh Balan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extractive industry faces increasing pressure to report sustainability performance measured through sustainability indicators (SI). Comprehensive sustainability reporting frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) contain nearly a hundred indicators that create reporting complexity and reduce comparability. Although existing research emphasizes context‐specific SI for emerging markets, few empirical studies identify relevant context‐specific SI. This study empirically derives a manageable set of SI for India's extractive industry from GRI's G4 framework. Data from reporting companies over 9 years were analyzed using three statistical techniques: multiple correspondence analysis, nonnegative matrix factorization, and cosine similarity analysis across economic, environmental, and social pillars. The analysis identified 27 SI (one‐third of the original list) that maintained parity with industry leaders. Back‐testing validated that no information was lost during reduction. This approach is scalable and replicable for other industries and geographies, making it a useful tool for sustainability researchers and practitioners.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN), Flame University (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Hyderabad Campus (IN), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.