Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the clinical feasibility of robust treatment planning for central nervous system (CNS) tumors using a gantry-less proton therapy configuration, with the goal of supporting adoption of compact proton systems that are more affordable and accessible. 
Approach: Treatment plans for CNS cases were created in RayStation with three configurations: a full-gantry with the patient in a supine position, and a fixed, horizontal beamline with the patient either in a supine or seated position. Robust optimization was used for each plan, accounting for ±2mm isotropic setup errors and ±3.5% range uncertainties. To simulate potential impact of slouch, anisotropic setup shifts (±2, ±3, ±4mm) in the superior-inferior direction were evaluated for treatments in the seated position. A radiation oncologist conducted a blind review of the gantry-based and gantry-less plans to determine the preferred option. Dose metrics and robustness were compared across the different configurations, and statistical analyses were performed to assess the significance of any differences. In total, there were 10 cases, 50 treatment plans, and 1,050 treatment course scenarios.
Main Results: Results showed that proton pencil beam scanning plans using a fixed horizontal beamline can produce comparable dosimetric outcomes to those utilizing a full-gantry. All three configurations achieved the required target coverage, with hotspots generally within 3-5% of the prescribed dose. In 8 out of 10 cases, the target homogeneity index was lowest in a gantry-less configuration. The gantry-based and gantry-less plans demonstrated similar robustness against setup errors and range uncertainties, though target coverage was slightly more robust in certain gantry or gantry-less plans, depending on the specific case and treatment configuration.
Significance: By integrating blinded radiation oncologist assessment with quantitative dosimetric analysis, this work shows that fixed, horizontal proton beamlines can deliver high-quality plans, supporting the initial clinical feasibility of compact proton therapy systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae7ec6
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system

Thomas Bortfeld, Andrzej Niemierko, MSN Helen Shih, Peter R. Jermain et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system

Thomas Bortfeld, Andrzej Niemierko, MSN Helen Shih, Peter R. Jermain, Nicolas Depauw, Susu Yan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the clinical feasibility of robust treatment planning for central nervous system (CNS) tumors using a gantry-less proton therapy configuration, with the goal of supporting adoption of compact proton systems that are more affordable and accessible. 
Approach: Treatment plans for CNS cases were created in RayStation with three configurations: a full-gantry with the patient in a supine position, and a fixed, horizontal beamline with the patient either in a supine or seated position. Robust optimization was used for each plan, accounting for ±2mm isotropic setup errors and ±3.5% range uncertainties. To simulate potential impact of slouch, anisotropic setup shifts (±2, ±3, ±4mm) in the superior-inferior direction were evaluated for treatments in the seated position. A radiation oncologist conducted a blind review of the gantry-based and gantry-less plans to determine the preferred option. Dose metrics and robustness were compared across the different configurations, and statistical analyses were performed to assess the significance of any differences. In total, there were 10 cases, 50 treatment plans, and 1,050 treatment course scenarios.
Main Results: Results showed that proton pencil beam scanning plans using a fixed horizontal beamline can produce comparable dosimetric outcomes to those utilizing a full-gantry. All three configurations achieved the required target coverage, with hotspots generally within 3-5% of the prescribed dose. In 8 out of 10 cases, the target homogeneity index was lowest in a gantry-less configuration. The gantry-based and gantry-less plans demonstrated similar robustness against setup errors and range uncertainties, though target coverage was slightly more robust in certain gantry or gantry-less plans, depending on the specific case and treatment configuration.
Significance: By integrating blinded radiation oncologist assessment with quantitative dosimetric analysis, this work shows that fixed, horizontal proton beamlines can deliver high-quality plans, supporting the initial clinical feasibility of compact proton therapy systems.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.