Conceptual Orthospaces—An Embedding Framework Accounting for Negation Operators and Convexity Constraints

Abstract One aim of neurosymbolic AI is to enhance subsymbolic learning approaches with symbolic information, e.g., in the form of background knowledge, to increase result quality, interpretability, and trustworthiness. To model subsymbolic information on facts and their similarities, embeddings into some vector space have been proven useful. Symbolic information can then be modeled directly in the space by representing concepts as some geometric objects and logical operators as geometrical operations. These embeddings provide the first step towards filling the gap between qualitative, Tarskian style semantics, which is used for deductive reasoning over the facts, and quantitative structures, which are used for representing objects, relations, and concepts for learning purposes. To enable meaningful reasoning, embeddings of concepts are not allowed to be arbitrarily shaped. Particularly convex sets turned out to be useful due to their computational advantages and due to their foundation in cognition. However, in this context, the geometric modeling of logical operators turns out to be challenging, particularly the modeling of negation. Therefore, this paper discusses a general framework for embeddings able to model an expressive negation. It is general in the sense that it allows for relaxations of the convexity constraint and for different strengths of negation. Thus, the proposed framework can act as a basis for interpretable embedding approaches of adaptable strength and thus fills a gap in the current embedding landscape by allowing for embeddings of expressive logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-026-00912-4
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Orthospaces—An Embedding Framework Accounting for Negation Operators and Convexity Constraints

Mena Leemhuis
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Conceptual Orthospaces—An Embedding Framework Accounting for Negation Operators and Convexity Constraints

Mena Leemhuis
article en

Abstract

Abstract One aim of neurosymbolic AI is to enhance subsymbolic learning approaches with symbolic information, e.g., in the form of background knowledge, to increase result quality, interpretability, and trustworthiness. To model subsymbolic information on facts and their similarities, embeddings into some vector space have been proven useful. Symbolic information can then be modeled directly in the space by representing concepts as some geometric objects and logical operators as geometrical operations. These embeddings provide the first step towards filling the gap between qualitative, Tarskian style semantics, which is used for deductive reasoning over the facts, and quantitative structures, which are used for representing objects, relations, and concepts for learning purposes. To enable meaningful reasoning, embeddings of concepts are not allowed to be arbitrarily shaped. Particularly convex sets turned out to be useful due to their computational advantages and due to their foundation in cognition. However, in this context, the geometric modeling of logical operators turns out to be challenging, particularly the modeling of negation. Therefore, this paper discusses a general framework for embeddings able to model an expressive negation. It is general in the sense that it allows for relaxations of the convexity constraint and for different strengths of negation. Thus, the proposed framework can act as a basis for interpretable embedding approaches of adaptable strength and thus fills a gap in the current embedding landscape by allowing for embeddings of expressive logics.

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.