Low-Carbon Environmental Control in Intensive Duck Houses: Envelope, Ventilation, Heat Pumps, and Moisture Management

Intensive duck production is shifting from greenhouse/curtain-sided houses toward closed, mechanically ventilated systems, yet low-carbon environmental control for moisture-dominated houses remains insufficiently synthesized. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework, this review aimed to identify low-carbon environmental-control pathways by integrating evidence on envelope design, ventilation, heat pump, and moisture management. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched for English-language articles published during 2018–2025. Direct duck house evidence was separated from transferable poultry, livestock-building, and building-energy evidence. Synthesis shows that water access, wet litter, stocking density, and climate make houses latent-load-dominated systems, affecting relative humidity (RH), ammonia (NH3), particulates, heat stress, welfare, and energy demand. Greenhouse-type houses have low energy use but weak environmental stability, whereas closed/windowless houses improve control and biosecurity but increase dependence on electricity, dehumidification, and backup systems. Low-carbon housing requires staged integration of moisture-source control, drainage, litter management, roof solar-load reduction, controlled ventilation, heat recovery, climate-suitable heat pumps, renewable electricity, sensor-based control, and resilience planning. Low-carbon environmental-control packages should be selected according to house type, climate, and management conditions. Future validation should report standardized energy, carbon, air quality, litter condition, welfare, productivity, cost, and outage-resilience metrics.