Beyond intention: A cognitive-affective-ethical framework for translation students' in-task acceptance of AI-generated feedback

Although large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into translator education, empirical evidence on how student translators engage with AI-generated feedback in situated, in-task practice remains limited. This mixed-methods study investigates translation students' behavioral acceptance of AI-generated feedback delivered through an LLM-embedded platform, examining the roles of baseline attitude toward AI, translation proficiency, and text genre. A total of 124 translation majors completed 3596 sentence-level accept/reject decisions, each accompanied by mandatory written rationales. Mixed-effects logistic regression revealed that all three factors independently and additively predicted acceptance: text genre emerged as the strongest within-person driver, with acceptance ranging from 81.2% for technical texts to 49.9% for literary excerpts; skeptical baseline attitudes significantly suppressed acceptance; and higher proficiency was associated with greater evaluative selectivity. Thematic analysis of written rationales identified nine reasoning mechanisms, spanning cognitive verification, affective trust calibration, and ethical-identity gatekeeping, which were integrated into a Cognitive-Affective-Ethical (CAE) framework extending the Technology Acceptance Model. CAE conceptualizes acceptance as a hierarchical, conditional process: cognitive evaluation filters feasibility, affective trust modulates reliance under uncertainty, and ethical considerations function as context-activated constraints that can override both cognitive and affective drivers. By shifting the analytical focus from pre-adoption intention to in-task behavioral judgment, this study advances a mechanism-based account of when, why, and under what ethical conditions AI-generated feedback is accepted in translator education, with implications for genre-aware pedagogy and the design of adaptive AI feedback systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107269
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond intention: A cognitive-affective-ethical framework for translation students' in-task acceptance of AI-generated feedback

Shiyue Chen, Tianli Zhou
Acta Psychologica
AI in Service Interactions
article

Beyond intention: A cognitive-affective-ethical framework for translation students' in-task acceptance of AI-generated feedback

Shiyue Chen, Tianli Zhou
article en

Abstract

Although large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into translator education, empirical evidence on how student translators engage with AI-generated feedback in situated, in-task practice remains limited. This mixed-methods study investigates translation students' behavioral acceptance of AI-generated feedback delivered through an LLM-embedded platform, examining the roles of baseline attitude toward AI, translation proficiency, and text genre. A total of 124 translation majors completed 3596 sentence-level accept/reject decisions, each accompanied by mandatory written rationales. Mixed-effects logistic regression revealed that all three factors independently and additively predicted acceptance: text genre emerged as the strongest within-person driver, with acceptance ranging from 81.2% for technical texts to 49.9% for literary excerpts; skeptical baseline attitudes significantly suppressed acceptance; and higher proficiency was associated with greater evaluative selectivity. Thematic analysis of written rationales identified nine reasoning mechanisms, spanning cognitive verification, affective trust calibration, and ethical-identity gatekeeping, which were integrated into a Cognitive-Affective-Ethical (CAE) framework extending the Technology Acceptance Model. CAE conceptualizes acceptance as a hierarchical, conditional process: cognitive evaluation filters feasibility, affective trust modulates reliance under uncertainty, and ethical considerations function as context-activated constraints that can override both cognitive and affective drivers. By shifting the analytical focus from pre-adoption intention to in-task behavioral judgment, this study advances a mechanism-based account of when, why, and under what ethical conditions AI-generated feedback is accepted in translator education, with implications for genre-aware pedagogy and the design of adaptive AI feedback systems.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 268
Zunyi Medical University (CN), Zhejiang Shuren University (CN)
Zhejiang Shuren University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.