Learning from Crowds Using a Focal Loss Function: Dealing with Imbalanced Annotations

Obtaining high-quality labeled data for supervised learning is costly, motivating the use of crowdsourcing, which distributes the annotation process across multiple workers with varying levels of expertise. A key challenge in crowdsourced data is annotation sparsity, as each worker labels only a limited subset of instances. This sparsity can amplify class imbalance, reduce supervision for minority classes, and bias standard cross-entropy-based models toward the majority classes. To address this problem, we propose a correlated chained Gaussian process framework trained on a focal-loss-based variational objective (CCGPFL). This probabilistic framework jointly models latent ground-truth and instance-dependent annotator reliability while accounting for correlations among annotators. In addition, the focal-weighted objective mitigates the imbalance induced by sparse annotations by assigning greater importance to harder examples during training. Experiments on synthetic, semi-synthetic, and fully real multi-annotator datasets show that CCGPFL achieves competitive and often superior performance relative to state-of-the-art learning-from-crowds baselines in terms of Overall Accuracy (OA) and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technologies
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14060370
Primary Topic
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning from Crowds Using a Focal Loss Function: Dealing with Imbalanced Annotations

David Augusto Cardenas Peña, Julián Gil-González, Andrés Marino Álvarez-Meza, Alvaro Orozco-Gutierrez et al.
Technologies
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
article

Learning from Crowds Using a Focal Loss Function: Dealing with Imbalanced Annotations

David Augusto Cardenas Peña, Julián Gil-González, Andrés Marino Álvarez-Meza, Alvaro Orozco-Gutierrez, Enrique D. Guijarro-Estelles
article en

Abstract

Obtaining high-quality labeled data for supervised learning is costly, motivating the use of crowdsourcing, which distributes the annotation process across multiple workers with varying levels of expertise. A key challenge in crowdsourced data is annotation sparsity, as each worker labels only a limited subset of instances. This sparsity can amplify class imbalance, reduce supervision for minority classes, and bias standard cross-entropy-based models toward the majority classes. To address this problem, we propose a correlated chained Gaussian process framework trained on a focal-loss-based variational objective (CCGPFL). This probabilistic framework jointly models latent ground-truth and instance-dependent annotator reliability while accounting for correlations among annotators. In addition, the focal-weighted objective mitigates the imbalance induced by sparse annotations by assigning greater importance to harder examples during training. Experiments on synthetic, semi-synthetic, and fully real multi-annotator datasets show that CCGPFL achieves competitive and often superior performance relative to state-of-the-art learning-from-crowds baselines in terms of Overall Accuracy (OA) and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC).

TechnologiesVol. 14(6)
Technological University of Pereira (CO), Universidad Autonoma de Manizales (CO), Universidad de Manizales (CO), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.