Retrospective Cohort Study: Extracting Coexisting Background Breast-Lesion Features from Stage I–III Invasive Breast Cancer
Background: Background breast features are frequently noted in pathology reports alongside invasive breast cancer but rarely factor into prognosis or treatment decisions. Their relationship to tumor characteristics and patient outcomes remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 7603 patients with Stage I–III invasive breast cancer (diagnosed 1991–2022, age < 80 years) from the Joint Breast Cancer Registry in Singapore. Natural language processing (NLP) was applied to 9754 free-text pathology reports to extract co-existing background breast features, with accuracy validated by dual-reviewer assessment of 200 reports. Because background features are most reliably assessed on excision specimens, the primary analytic cohort comprised 3988 patients with available excision pathology reports. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering grouped extracted features into three categories. Associations with tumor characteristics were assessed with multinomial logistic regression and ten-year overall survival by Cox proportional hazards models (median follow-up 9.6 years; 620 deaths). Results: Here, we show that NLP-based extraction of background breast features from routine pathology reports achieves an accuracy of over 90% across features. Lobular neoplasia and benign proliferative changes are associated with less aggressive tumor characteristics, whereas early neoplastic and papillary lesions are more prevalent in HER2-enriched and luminal B tumor subtypes. Benign proliferative changes are associated with better survival in age- and year-adjusted models (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.97), but this association is attenuated after adjustment for stage and subtype. Conclusions: NLP-enabled extraction of background breast features from pathology text is feasible at scale. These features reflect tumor biology but do not independently add prognostic information beyond established clinical variables.
Authors
- Mikael Hartman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-9965)
- Jingmei Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-7511)
- Benita Kiat Tee Tan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-4606)
- Serene Si Ning Goh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-2142)
- Lester Chee Hao Leong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-7134)
- Ern Yu Tan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7726-3974)
- Phyu Nitar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1587-5004)
- Veronique Kiak Mien Tan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-8191)
- Geok Hoon Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-3437)
- Fuh Yong Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6658-3371)
- Kah Weng Lau
- Ryan Jak Yang Lim
- on behalf of the Joint Breast Cancer Registry
Institutions
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- SingHealth (SG)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Singapore General Hospital (SG)
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
- Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (SG)
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG)
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
- National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
- National University Health System (SG)
- Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
- Genome Institute of Singapore (SG)
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (SG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cancers
- Published
- 2026-06-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18121965
- Primary Topic
- AI in cancer detection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research