Piezosurgery-assisted protocol for impacted mandibular third molar removal with 3D facial swelling analysis: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial on post-surgical sequelae

OBJECTIVES: This split-mouth randomized controlled trial aimed to compare a novel piezosurgery protocol versus a conventional rotary technique for the extraction of mesio-angulated and horizontally impacted mandibular third molars (MA-HM3Ms), evaluating postoperative inflammatory sequelae and patient-centered outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven healthy adult patients underwent bilateral MA-HM3M extraction with piezosurgery protocol (test group, TG) and, contralaterally, with conventional rotary instruments and manual elevators (control group, CG). Facial swelling was objectively quantified using three-dimensional facial scans at 2 and 7 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, maximum mouth opening, bleeding, surgical time, analgesic intake, complications, and patient-reported outcomes assessed using the PoSSe scale. Statistical analysis was performed using paired comparisons and regression models (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-four extractions were analyzed. After 2 days, lower facial swelling was significantly reduced in TG compared with CG (p = 0.01), together with less pronounced trismus (p = 0.016). Pain was consistently lower in the TG at all timepoints, while postoperative bleeding and analgesic intake were significantly higher in the CG (p < 0.05). Surgical time was longer in TG than in CG (p < 0.001). The piezosurgery protocol significantly reduced interference with daily activities and resulted in higher patient satisfaction. Regression analyses showed a direct association between swelling and PoSSe scale in both groups. No permanent neurological complications were observed; alveolitis occurred in 3 CG and 2 TG sites. CONCLUSIONS: This split-mouth randomized controlled trial suggests that piezosurgery for MA-HM3M extraction effectively reduces early postoperative inflammatory sequelae, improving patient-centered outcomes and quality of life, despite longer operative times. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed piezoelectric protocol could represent a minimally invasive alternative to conventional rotary techniques, particularly in complex MA-HM3M extractions, enhancing patient comfort and quality of life during the most critical postoperative period while supporting a more controlled and refined surgical approach. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT06212232, Registration date: 25 January 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06982-w
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piezosurgery-assisted protocol for impacted mandibular third molar removal with 3D facial swelling analysis: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial on post-surgical sequelae

Alessandro Antonelli, Francesco Bennardo, Amerigo Giudice, Selene Barone et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Piezosurgery-assisted protocol for impacted mandibular third molar removal with 3D facial swelling analysis: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial on post-surgical sequelae

Alessandro Antonelli, Francesco Bennardo, Amerigo Giudice, Selene Barone, Marianna Salviati, Giulia Brunello, Jason Motta Jones
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This split-mouth randomized controlled trial aimed to compare a novel piezosurgery protocol versus a conventional rotary technique for the extraction of mesio-angulated and horizontally impacted mandibular third molars (MA-HM3Ms), evaluating postoperative inflammatory sequelae and patient-centered outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven healthy adult patients underwent bilateral MA-HM3M extraction with piezosurgery protocol (test group, TG) and, contralaterally, with conventional rotary instruments and manual elevators (control group, CG). Facial swelling was objectively quantified using three-dimensional facial scans at 2 and 7 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, maximum mouth opening, bleeding, surgical time, analgesic intake, complications, and patient-reported outcomes assessed using the PoSSe scale. Statistical analysis was performed using paired comparisons and regression models (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-four extractions were analyzed. After 2 days, lower facial swelling was significantly reduced in TG compared with CG (p = 0.01), together with less pronounced trismus (p = 0.016). Pain was consistently lower in the TG at all timepoints, while postoperative bleeding and analgesic intake were significantly higher in the CG (p < 0.05). Surgical time was longer in TG than in CG (p < 0.001). The piezosurgery protocol significantly reduced interference with daily activities and resulted in higher patient satisfaction. Regression analyses showed a direct association between swelling and PoSSe scale in both groups. No permanent neurological complications were observed; alveolitis occurred in 3 CG and 2 TG sites. CONCLUSIONS: This split-mouth randomized controlled trial suggests that piezosurgery for MA-HM3M extraction effectively reduces early postoperative inflammatory sequelae, improving patient-centered outcomes and quality of life, despite longer operative times. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed piezoelectric protocol could represent a minimally invasive alternative to conventional rotary techniques, particularly in complex MA-HM3M extractions, enhancing patient comfort and quality of life during the most critical postoperative period while supporting a more controlled and refined surgical approach. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT06212232, Registration date: 25 January 2024.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 30(7)
Humanitas University (IT), Magna Graecia University (IT), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.