The Indeterministic Resilience Doctrine: Foundational Investigation

The Indeterministic Resilience Doctrine is an open, continuity-discipline methodology for governing agentic AI capabilities in critical operations. Classical business continuity practice rests on three assumptions that agentic systems break: that a process is a fixed sequence of steps, that recovery means restoring a known state, and that forensic reconstruction is a mechanical replay of logs. When the consequential decision is made by an agent rather than by a deterministic process or a human, classical practice runs short at exactly the points that matter. This investigation specifies the doctrine that closes that gap. It sets out three foundational frames and eight concepts, among them the AI Capabilities BIA, the Capability Envelope, recovery objectives for behavior, competence, and trust, the Last Reproducible Decision Point, the Forensic Reproducibility Objective, and the Indeterminism Tolerance Window. The doctrine extends classical methodology rather than replacing it, and complements the security-discipline frameworks the AI governance landscape has produced. It is offered to the community for review, adoption, and refinement under CC-BY 4.0.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20734343
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Indeterministic Resilience Doctrine: Foundational Investigation

Saúl Varela
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Indeterministic Resilience Doctrine: Foundational Investigation

Saúl Varela
article en

Abstract

The Indeterministic Resilience Doctrine is an open, continuity-discipline methodology for governing agentic AI capabilities in critical operations. Classical business continuity practice rests on three assumptions that agentic systems break: that a process is a fixed sequence of steps, that recovery means restoring a known state, and that forensic reconstruction is a mechanical replay of logs. When the consequential decision is made by an agent rather than by a deterministic process or a human, classical practice runs short at exactly the points that matter. This investigation specifies the doctrine that closes that gap. It sets out three foundational frames and eight concepts, among them the AI Capabilities BIA, the Capability Envelope, recovery objectives for behavior, competence, and trust, the Last Reproducible Decision Point, the Forensic Reproducibility Objective, and the Indeterminism Tolerance Window. The doctrine extends classical methodology rather than replacing it, and complements the security-discipline frameworks the AI governance landscape has produced. It is offered to the community for review, adoption, and refinement under CC-BY 4.0.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Independiente (CR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.