Life-Wandering and Death-Return of Liezi with Cross-Comparison to Plato’s Soul-Journey

The Liezi constitutes an important link between the Lao-Zhuang tradition and later Daoism, yet it has long remained marginal in scholarship due to controversies surrounding its provenance. Moving beyond debates over textual authenticity, this article examines Liezi’s reflections on life and death through a comparative dialogue with Plato’s account of the soul’s journey with you 游 as a bridging notion. In the Liezi, life is construed as a temporary wandering and death an inevitable return. This understanding weakens fixed subjectivity and normative structures, articulating a mode of cultivation that emphasizes accommodation, detachment, and the coexistence with the myriad things in a quasi-religious cosmos. In Plato, by contrast, the soul persists as a moral subject journeying between the sensible and intelligible worlds. It is integrated into a religious cosmic order that unites epistemic with ethical dimensions and is ultimately oriented toward its purification and return to the intelligible world. The comparison reveals a structural divergence between the two thinkers in the ultimate placement of human existence, while also demonstrating how cross-cultural comparison can generate mutually illuminating insights and reopen reflection on the Liezi’s place in intellectual history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17060726
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life-Wandering and Death-Return of Liezi with Cross-Comparison to Plato’s Soul-Journey

Xiangfei Bao, Yufeng Yang
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Life-Wandering and Death-Return of Liezi with Cross-Comparison to Plato’s Soul-Journey

Xiangfei Bao, Yufeng Yang
article en

Abstract

The Liezi constitutes an important link between the Lao-Zhuang tradition and later Daoism, yet it has long remained marginal in scholarship due to controversies surrounding its provenance. Moving beyond debates over textual authenticity, this article examines Liezi’s reflections on life and death through a comparative dialogue with Plato’s account of the soul’s journey with you 游 as a bridging notion. In the Liezi, life is construed as a temporary wandering and death an inevitable return. This understanding weakens fixed subjectivity and normative structures, articulating a mode of cultivation that emphasizes accommodation, detachment, and the coexistence with the myriad things in a quasi-religious cosmos. In Plato, by contrast, the soul persists as a moral subject journeying between the sensible and intelligible worlds. It is integrated into a religious cosmic order that unites epistemic with ethical dimensions and is ultimately oriented toward its purification and return to the intelligible world. The comparison reveals a structural divergence between the two thinkers in the ultimate placement of human existence, while also demonstrating how cross-cultural comparison can generate mutually illuminating insights and reopen reflection on the Liezi’s place in intellectual history.

ReligionsVol. 17(6)
Wuhan University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.