Democratic Institutions Under Threat: Corrosive Frames, Internet News, and the U.S. Supreme Court

Are democratic institutions under threat in the United States? We examine an understudied democratic bedrock: the judiciary and, in particular, the U.S. Supreme Court. We draw on data from “SCOTUSapp,” a tool that provides a database of 100,000+ news articles across thousands of unexamined sources. We find a new media environment where the Court receives attention from thousands of ideologically fragmented outlets. Additionally, some framings of the Court are potentially corrosive. We then use two experiments to examine the effects of these corrosive news frames. The first experiment (October 2021) provides evidence that frames portraying the Court as embroiled in secrecy, hypocrisy, illegitimacy, and politics cause a decrease in support for judicial independence. These frames are influential among Republicans and Democrats. The second experiment (May 2023) follows Dobbs, which severely damaged judicial faith among Democrats, and shows that corrosive frames lead to a corresponding decline only among strong Republicans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Communication
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2682952
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Institutions Under Threat: Corrosive Frames, Internet News, and the U.S. Supreme Court

Michael A. Zilis, Justin Wedeking
Political Communication
Media Influence and Politics
article

Democratic Institutions Under Threat: Corrosive Frames, Internet News, and the U.S. Supreme Court

Michael A. Zilis, Justin Wedeking
article en

Abstract

Are democratic institutions under threat in the United States? We examine an understudied democratic bedrock: the judiciary and, in particular, the U.S. Supreme Court. We draw on data from “SCOTUSapp,” a tool that provides a database of 100,000+ news articles across thousands of unexamined sources. We find a new media environment where the Court receives attention from thousands of ideologically fragmented outlets. Additionally, some framings of the Court are potentially corrosive. We then use two experiments to examine the effects of these corrosive news frames. The first experiment (October 2021) provides evidence that frames portraying the Court as embroiled in secrecy, hypocrisy, illegitimacy, and politics cause a decrease in support for judicial independence. These frames are influential among Republicans and Democrats. The second experiment (May 2023) follows Dobbs, which severely damaged judicial faith among Democrats, and shows that corrosive frames lead to a corresponding decline only among strong Republicans.

Political Communication
University of Kentucky (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.