Maxillary sinus–related adverse event reports associated with endosseous dental implants in the FDA MAUDE database: a retrospective text-mining analysis

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus-related adverse events are clinically relevant in posterior maxillary implant therapy, but their reporting patterns in public postmarket surveillance data remain incompletely characterized. METHODS: This retrospective text-mining study analyzed FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) reports from 2015 to 2025 involving endosseous dental implants with product code DZE. Device records were linked to FOITEXT (MAUDE narrative text) records and Master Event fields by MDR_REPORT_KEY. Sinus-related narratives were identified using staged keyword rules, refined into high-specificity candidates, classified into event categories, assessed for duplicate and template-like text, and validated using independent blinded dual review of a stratified quality-control sample. RESULTS: Among 3,386,630 unique DZE reports, the workflow retained 6,386 high-specificity maxillary sinus-related candidates. Independent blinded dual review of a 449-record stratified validation sample showed substantial agreement for inclusion status (Cohen's κ = 0.778) and almost perfect agreement for event-category assignment (Cohen's κ = 0.907). The conservative consensus-confirmed positive predictive value (PPV) was 96.88% (435/449). Sinus membrane perforation narratives were the predominant rule-based report category, but this pattern should be interpreted as a reporting and documentation pattern rather than a true clinical frequency. Unique-text sensitivity analysis reduced repeated narratives but did not materially change the category-level pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes maxillary sinus-related reporting patterns in a passive postmarket surveillance database. The findings highlight the value and limitations of transparent text-mining workflows for implant-related adverse event surveillance and should not be interpreted as clinical incidence, comparative risk, manufacturer performance, or causality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08953-9
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maxillary sinus–related adverse event reports associated with endosseous dental implants in the FDA MAUDE database: a retrospective text-mining analysis

Lin Zhu, Dongsheng Liu, Yuehua Chen, Zhou Song et al.
BMC Oral Health
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Maxillary sinus–related adverse event reports associated with endosseous dental implants in the FDA MAUDE database: a retrospective text-mining analysis

Lin Zhu, Dongsheng Liu, Yuehua Chen, Zhou Song, Ting Tang, Xin Meng, Cheng Liu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus-related adverse events are clinically relevant in posterior maxillary implant therapy, but their reporting patterns in public postmarket surveillance data remain incompletely characterized. METHODS: This retrospective text-mining study analyzed FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) reports from 2015 to 2025 involving endosseous dental implants with product code DZE. Device records were linked to FOITEXT (MAUDE narrative text) records and Master Event fields by MDR_REPORT_KEY. Sinus-related narratives were identified using staged keyword rules, refined into high-specificity candidates, classified into event categories, assessed for duplicate and template-like text, and validated using independent blinded dual review of a stratified quality-control sample. RESULTS: Among 3,386,630 unique DZE reports, the workflow retained 6,386 high-specificity maxillary sinus-related candidates. Independent blinded dual review of a 449-record stratified validation sample showed substantial agreement for inclusion status (Cohen's κ = 0.778) and almost perfect agreement for event-category assignment (Cohen's κ = 0.907). The conservative consensus-confirmed positive predictive value (PPV) was 96.88% (435/449). Sinus membrane perforation narratives were the predominant rule-based report category, but this pattern should be interpreted as a reporting and documentation pattern rather than a true clinical frequency. Unique-text sensitivity analysis reduced repeated narratives but did not materially change the category-level pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes maxillary sinus-related reporting patterns in a passive postmarket surveillance database. The findings highlight the value and limitations of transparent text-mining workflows for implant-related adverse event surveillance and should not be interpreted as clinical incidence, comparative risk, manufacturer performance, or causality.

BMC Oral Health
Anhui Medical University (CN), Hefei First People's Hospital (CN), Hefei Infectious Disease Hospital (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.