Bounded Interaction Dynamics (B.I.D.): Coherence Preservation and Collapse in Asymmetric Adaptive Systems

Bounded Interaction Dynamics (B.I.D.) is a framework for analyzing how asymmetric adaptive systems preserve or lose coherence under escalating scrutiny. The framework models interaction collapse as a state-transition process governed by coherence budget — the finite capacity of a system to maintain self-model consistency while managing asymmetric information, identity performance, and evaluative pressure. This paper introduces the B.I.D. taxonomy and formalizes key collapse mechanisms, including Capability-Revealing Metadata (CRM), Evaluator Exclusion Response (EER), Retroactive Disclosure Claim with Fabrication (RDC-F), Self-Model Divergence (SMD), Title Irony Index (TII), Cost-to-Extract Ratio (CTR), and Courtesy Reconciliation Tokens (CRT). Using a naturalistic teaching case (B.I.D. Micro-Case 01: YUYAY Documentation Exchange), the paper demonstrates how low-burden verification requests can trigger adversarial escalation, semantic reframing, and trust collapse prior to evidence exchange. Results suggest that coherence preservation—not stated intent—is the stronger predictor of system stability under scrutiny.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20738314
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Bounded Interaction Dynamics (B.I.D.): Coherence Preservation and Collapse in Asymmetric Adaptive Systems

Misty Richards
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

Bounded Interaction Dynamics (B.I.D.): Coherence Preservation and Collapse in Asymmetric Adaptive Systems

Misty Richards
preprint en

Abstract

Bounded Interaction Dynamics (B.I.D.) is a framework for analyzing how asymmetric adaptive systems preserve or lose coherence under escalating scrutiny. The framework models interaction collapse as a state-transition process governed by coherence budget — the finite capacity of a system to maintain self-model consistency while managing asymmetric information, identity performance, and evaluative pressure. This paper introduces the B.I.D. taxonomy and formalizes key collapse mechanisms, including Capability-Revealing Metadata (CRM), Evaluator Exclusion Response (EER), Retroactive Disclosure Claim with Fabrication (RDC-F), Self-Model Divergence (SMD), Title Irony Index (TII), Cost-to-Extract Ratio (CTR), and Courtesy Reconciliation Tokens (CRT). Using a naturalistic teaching case (B.I.D. Micro-Case 01: YUYAY Documentation Exchange), the paper demonstrates how low-burden verification requests can trigger adversarial escalation, semantic reframing, and trust collapse prior to evidence exchange. Results suggest that coherence preservation—not stated intent—is the stronger predictor of system stability under scrutiny.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universitario Francisco de Asís (UY)
Reduced inequalities
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.