The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial of intrapleural LTI-01 in patients with infected, non-draining pleural effusions

BACKGROUND: Single chain urokinase (LTI-01) intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET) was safe and promising in a phase 1 clinical trial to overcome failed drainage in patients with pleural infection. The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, dose-ranging study in hospitalized subjects with infected, non-draining pleural effusions. METHODS: LTI-01, in doses of 400,000, 800,000 or 1,200,000 Units, or placebo was administered intrapleurally once daily for up to 3 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was incidence of treatment failure within 7 days of starting study medication. Treatment failure was defined as requiring alternative pleural therapy irrespective of subsequent treatment. Pleural opacification was a secondary endpoint and was assessed by CT imaging of the change in opacified area expressed as a percentage of the ipsilateral hemithorax (relative change) or absolute change in pleural opacification volume expressed in liters. RESULTS: 40/43 enrolled patients received LTI-01 or placebo due to constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no significant difference in incidence of treatment failure between the LTI-01 and placebo groups (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.24,4.44, P = 0.96) while two predetermined sensitivity analyses demonstrated trends of improved efficacy in the 400,000 U group (P = 0.052 and 0.147). The absolute (Liters; L) and relative change from baseline in opacity volume were - 0.28 L (p=0.035) and - 55.8% (P = 0.064) versus placebo in the 800,000 U group, with significant reduction in absolute opacification found in the 400,000 and all LTI-01-treated groups combined (P < 0.03, respectively). There were no safety signals of concern, nor were there any episodes of intrapleural or pulmonary bleeding in LTI-01-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment failure was seen, potentially related to low recruitment. Trends towards efficacy were observed in predetermined sensitivity analyses at the 400,000 U dose of intrapleural LTI-01. Pleural opacification appeared most improved by the 800,000 U intrapleural LTI-01. A larger phase 2b trial is required to confirm these results or determine the efficacy of LTI-01 in patients with organizing, nondraining, infected pleural effusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04159831. Registration date: November 12, 2019.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Research
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-026-03782-4
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial of intrapleural LTI-01 in patients with infected, non-draining pleural effusions

Fayez Kheir, PUSHAN JANI, Brian Windsor, Steven Shoemaker et al.
Respiratory Research
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial of intrapleural LTI-01 in patients with infected, non-draining pleural effusions

Fayez Kheir, PUSHAN JANI, Brian Windsor, Steven Shoemaker, Fabien Maldonado, J Kurman, Michal Šenitko, Najib Mahboob Rahman, Samira Shojaee, C. Kevin, Carla Lamb, Ali Musani, Momen Wahidi, Steven Idell, J Akulian, A Chen, G Z Cheng, Danish Ahmad, Singh P. Karan, Lonny Yarmus, Christian Alvarado, Jonathan Puchalski, Muhanned Abu-Hijleh, Sikandar Ansari
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single chain urokinase (LTI-01) intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET) was safe and promising in a phase 1 clinical trial to overcome failed drainage in patients with pleural infection. The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, dose-ranging study in hospitalized subjects with infected, non-draining pleural effusions. METHODS: LTI-01, in doses of 400,000, 800,000 or 1,200,000 Units, or placebo was administered intrapleurally once daily for up to 3 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was incidence of treatment failure within 7 days of starting study medication. Treatment failure was defined as requiring alternative pleural therapy irrespective of subsequent treatment. Pleural opacification was a secondary endpoint and was assessed by CT imaging of the change in opacified area expressed as a percentage of the ipsilateral hemithorax (relative change) or absolute change in pleural opacification volume expressed in liters. RESULTS: 40/43 enrolled patients received LTI-01 or placebo due to constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no significant difference in incidence of treatment failure between the LTI-01 and placebo groups (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.24,4.44, P = 0.96) while two predetermined sensitivity analyses demonstrated trends of improved efficacy in the 400,000 U group (P = 0.052 and 0.147). The absolute (Liters; L) and relative change from baseline in opacity volume were - 0.28 L (p=0.035) and - 55.8% (P = 0.064) versus placebo in the 800,000 U group, with significant reduction in absolute opacification found in the 400,000 and all LTI-01-treated groups combined (P < 0.03, respectively). There were no safety signals of concern, nor were there any episodes of intrapleural or pulmonary bleeding in LTI-01-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment failure was seen, potentially related to low recruitment. Trends towards efficacy were observed in predetermined sensitivity analyses at the 400,000 U dose of intrapleural LTI-01. Pleural opacification appeared most improved by the 800,000 U intrapleural LTI-01. A larger phase 2b trial is required to confirm these results or determine the efficacy of LTI-01 in patients with organizing, nondraining, infected pleural effusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04159831. Registration date: November 12, 2019.

Respiratory Research
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Northwestern University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US), Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Memorial Hermann (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of San Diego (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), The University of Texas at Tyler (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Lenox Hill Hospital (US), LDS Hospital (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Cassava Sciences (United States) (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), Lahey Medical Center (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US), Temple University Health System (US), Instituto de Filosofía (ES), Pulmonary Associates (US), Memorial Hermann–Texas Medical Center (US), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.