Emergency department eCPR: an exploratory observational study of human factors

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is a low-frequency, high-acuity intervention requiring technical skills and coordinated team performance. This exploratory study observed eCPR cases for elements of teamwork, provider stress, and environmental factors in the Emergency Department (ED). Reid's conceptual framework domains for human factors in healthcare teams were used as an analytical lens for interpreting the data. METHODS: An exploratory two-phase study was conducted across two eCPR hospital sites over 32 months, with an initial simulation and non-eCPR observation phase used to refine study methods. A subsequent eCPR case phase used convenience sampling of adult cardiac arrests to observe actual eCPR events. Following consent, eCPR team members allocated to key roles (such as team leadership and cannulation) were observed in detail during each case. Patient outcomes included Utstein measures and eCPR timings. Provider outcomes included mobile heart rate monitoring, salivary cortisol, and validated psychometric measures. Teamwork was assessed using the Mayo High-Performance Team Score (MHPTS). Environmental outcomes included measurements of ambient noise levels, team headcounts, and observations of eCPR workflow. RESULTS: Eighteen providers were observed during six eCPR events. The mean case age was 44.7 years and most patients presented with a shockable rhythm. System features consistently observed in the eCPR cases included predefined roles, individuals assigned to crowd control, and team leader summaries. Causal interpretations are limited by the small sample size and risk of observational bias. Within these limitations, individual provider salivary cortisol measurements were higher after eCPR copared with paired baseline samples. Teamwork scores (MHPTS) were in a moderate to high range (median = 12; IQR 10-13) and environmental observations reflected noisy ED spaces and crowding (headcount median = 20; IQR 18-29). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study found that human factors outcomes can be feasibly assessed during ED eCPR. Predefined roles and structured communication were observed and warrant further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01650-4
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency department eCPR: an exploratory observational study of human factors

Matthew Oliver, Natalie Kruit, Henry Crayton, Andrew Coggins et al.
BMC Emergency Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Emergency department eCPR: an exploratory observational study of human factors

Matthew Oliver, Natalie Kruit, Henry Crayton, Andrew Coggins, Amelia Scott, Jeremiah E. Cho
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is a low-frequency, high-acuity intervention requiring technical skills and coordinated team performance. This exploratory study observed eCPR cases for elements of teamwork, provider stress, and environmental factors in the Emergency Department (ED). Reid's conceptual framework domains for human factors in healthcare teams were used as an analytical lens for interpreting the data. METHODS: An exploratory two-phase study was conducted across two eCPR hospital sites over 32 months, with an initial simulation and non-eCPR observation phase used to refine study methods. A subsequent eCPR case phase used convenience sampling of adult cardiac arrests to observe actual eCPR events. Following consent, eCPR team members allocated to key roles (such as team leadership and cannulation) were observed in detail during each case. Patient outcomes included Utstein measures and eCPR timings. Provider outcomes included mobile heart rate monitoring, salivary cortisol, and validated psychometric measures. Teamwork was assessed using the Mayo High-Performance Team Score (MHPTS). Environmental outcomes included measurements of ambient noise levels, team headcounts, and observations of eCPR workflow. RESULTS: Eighteen providers were observed during six eCPR events. The mean case age was 44.7 years and most patients presented with a shockable rhythm. System features consistently observed in the eCPR cases included predefined roles, individuals assigned to crowd control, and team leader summaries. Causal interpretations are limited by the small sample size and risk of observational bias. Within these limitations, individual provider salivary cortisol measurements were higher after eCPR copared with paired baseline samples. Teamwork scores (MHPTS) were in a moderate to high range (median = 12; IQR 10-13) and environmental observations reflected noisy ED spaces and crowding (headcount median = 20; IQR 18-29). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study found that human factors outcomes can be feasibly assessed during ED eCPR. Predefined roles and structured communication were observed and warrant further study.

BMC Emergency Medicine
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.