In-Class AI Use and Attitudes Among University Students: The Different Mediating Roles of Cognitive Relief and Cognitive Offloading

AI use is associated with both cognitive relief and cognitive offloading, leading to uncertainty in how users make value judgments and decisions. This study focuses on in-class AI use and explores the perceptions of cognitive relief and cognitive offloading among university students, as well as the distinct mediating mechanisms through which these factors shape the attitudes of students. Based on questionnaire data from 287 respondents, structural equation modeling and bootstrap methods were employed to test the research hypotheses. The results show that cognitive relief exerts a complementary mediating effect between AI use and attitudes, whereas cognitive offloading functions as a competitive mediator. The two mechanisms produce opposing effects on students, with cognitive relief demonstrating a stronger overall mediating effect. These findings suggest that educators should guide students toward a more nuanced understanding of AI use to mitigate confusion and its potential negative psychological consequences. Moreover, educators and institutions should leverage AI to provide cognitive relief for higher-order learning activities, thereby enhancing the engagement, motivation, and deeper learning processes of students, while simultaneously implementing reflective and critical thinking practices to guard against the risks of cognitive offloading. This study is limited by its single-institution convenience sample and reliance on self-reported data; future research incorporating qualitative methods such as interviews and classroom observations is encouraged to further validate and extend these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16061014
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Class AI Use and Attitudes Among University Students: The Different Mediating Roles of Cognitive Relief and Cognitive Offloading

Wenqiang Fan, Yuxia Li, Lu Cheng, Yue Wang et al.
Behavioral Sciences
AI in Service Interactions
article

In-Class AI Use and Attitudes Among University Students: The Different Mediating Roles of Cognitive Relief and Cognitive Offloading

Wenqiang Fan, Yuxia Li, Lu Cheng, Yue Wang, Qi Zhao
article en

Abstract

AI use is associated with both cognitive relief and cognitive offloading, leading to uncertainty in how users make value judgments and decisions. This study focuses on in-class AI use and explores the perceptions of cognitive relief and cognitive offloading among university students, as well as the distinct mediating mechanisms through which these factors shape the attitudes of students. Based on questionnaire data from 287 respondents, structural equation modeling and bootstrap methods were employed to test the research hypotheses. The results show that cognitive relief exerts a complementary mediating effect between AI use and attitudes, whereas cognitive offloading functions as a competitive mediator. The two mechanisms produce opposing effects on students, with cognitive relief demonstrating a stronger overall mediating effect. These findings suggest that educators should guide students toward a more nuanced understanding of AI use to mitigate confusion and its potential negative psychological consequences. Moreover, educators and institutions should leverage AI to provide cognitive relief for higher-order learning activities, thereby enhancing the engagement, motivation, and deeper learning processes of students, while simultaneously implementing reflective and critical thinking practices to guard against the risks of cognitive offloading. This study is limited by its single-institution convenience sample and reliance on self-reported data; future research incorporating qualitative methods such as interviews and classroom observations is encouraged to further validate and extend these findings.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(6)
Beihang University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.