Selecting a Sustainable Farm Tractor Using a Software-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System

Choosing the most suitable tractor is a complex and high-stakes decision where technical performance, financial capability, and sustainability considerations must be balanced. However, tractor selection in existing studies lacks objective, sustainability-oriented evaluation frameworks, leaving farmers vulnerable to potentially poor investments with long-term economic, operational, and environmental impacts. Therefore, this research proposes a software-based Decision Support System (DSS) that incorporates objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models within a management control perspective focused on sustainability and provides a clear, data-driven method for tractor selection for small farmers. Four popular tractor models in Egypt were selected for evaluation based on three criteria related to sustainability: power (C1), purchase price (C2), and availability of maintenance and spare parts (C3). Subsequently, a DSS was implemented using Python, and five MCDM methods—CRITIC, MEREC, Entropy, Standard Deviation (SD), and TOPSIS—were used to select the tractor that best meets sustainability objectives. The findings indicate that tractor T2, which had the lowest purchase price (USD 12,390) and enough power (60 HP), was the best-rated tractor. The impact of each criterion varied by method: C1 was the most important in the Entropy method (0.3657), while C2 was the most important in the CRITIC (0.5552), MEREC (0.3432), and SD (0.5938) weightings. The proposed DSS improves transparency and supports more informed, evidence-based decisions in agricultural mechanization. Overall, the system offers a practical and scalable tool that helps smallholder farmers and policymakers make sustainable tractor choices, contributing to progress toward SDGs 2, 7, 12, and 13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126211
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting a Sustainable Farm Tractor Using a Software-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System

M. Refai, Tarek Kh. Abdelkader, Fatma M. Shaaban, Mahmoud A. Abdelhamid et al.
Sustainability
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

Selecting a Sustainable Farm Tractor Using a Software-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System

M. Refai, Tarek Kh. Abdelkader, Fatma M. Shaaban, Mahmoud A. Abdelhamid, Hassan A. A. Sayed, YURI A. SUDNIK, ashrf anwer, Mahmoud Younis, Evgenii A. Chetverikov
article en

Abstract

Choosing the most suitable tractor is a complex and high-stakes decision where technical performance, financial capability, and sustainability considerations must be balanced. However, tractor selection in existing studies lacks objective, sustainability-oriented evaluation frameworks, leaving farmers vulnerable to potentially poor investments with long-term economic, operational, and environmental impacts. Therefore, this research proposes a software-based Decision Support System (DSS) that incorporates objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models within a management control perspective focused on sustainability and provides a clear, data-driven method for tractor selection for small farmers. Four popular tractor models in Egypt were selected for evaluation based on three criteria related to sustainability: power (C1), purchase price (C2), and availability of maintenance and spare parts (C3). Subsequently, a DSS was implemented using Python, and five MCDM methods—CRITIC, MEREC, Entropy, Standard Deviation (SD), and TOPSIS—were used to select the tractor that best meets sustainability objectives. The findings indicate that tractor T2, which had the lowest purchase price (USD 12,390) and enough power (60 HP), was the best-rated tractor. The impact of each criterion varied by method: C1 was the most important in the Entropy method (0.3657), while C2 was the most important in the CRITIC (0.5552), MEREC (0.3432), and SD (0.5938) weightings. The proposed DSS improves transparency and supports more informed, evidence-based decisions in agricultural mechanization. Overall, the system offers a practical and scalable tool that helps smallholder farmers and policymakers make sustainable tractor choices, contributing to progress toward SDGs 2, 7, 12, and 13.

SustainabilityVol. 18(12)
Ain Shams University (EG), Yunnan Normal University (CN), Cairo University (EG), Al-Azhar University (EG), King Saud University (SA), Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin (RU), China Agricultural University (CN), Fayoum University (EG)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.