Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have significantly improved survival outcomes in melanoma; however, questions persist regarding comparative efficacy across regimens and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker. We therefore performed a meta-analysis evaluating outcomes according to PD-L1 expression status using the most recent follow-up data from each study. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2010 to 1 April 2025 for phase II and III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy or combined with other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted therapy in the adjuvant/metastatic setting. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects models, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The present meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251090090). Results: Fifteen RCTs including 9979 patients were included. In the overall analysis, PD-1 inhibitors were associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66–0.86) compared with control treatments. In the unresectable or metastatic setting, progression-free survival (PFS) was also significantly improved (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49–0.76). Survival benefits were observed in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors, with improved PFS in PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48–0.83) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44–0.77), as well as improved OS in PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67–0.93), without evidence of effect modification by PD-L1 expression. PD-1 inhibitor-based regimens were not associated with a statistically significant increase in grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.71–1.79); however, heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 96.0%). Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitor-based therapies significantly improve survival outcomes in advanced melanoma across PD-L1 subgroups. No clear evidence of differential treatment benefit according to PD-L1 expression was observed, suggesting limited utility as a standalone predictive biomarker. Further studies integrating molecular and immune profiling are warranted to optimize individualized treatment selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124721
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Konstantinos Lallas, Nikolaos-Iasonas Kouris, M Gavriatopoulou, Ioannis Ntanasis‐Stathopoulos et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Konstantinos Lallas, Nikolaos-Iasonas Kouris, M Gavriatopoulou, Ioannis Ntanasis‐Stathopoulos, Evangelos Terpos, Charalampos Filippatos, Panagiotis Malandrakis, Sofia Spyropoulou
article en

Abstract

Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have significantly improved survival outcomes in melanoma; however, questions persist regarding comparative efficacy across regimens and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker. We therefore performed a meta-analysis evaluating outcomes according to PD-L1 expression status using the most recent follow-up data from each study. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2010 to 1 April 2025 for phase II and III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy or combined with other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted therapy in the adjuvant/metastatic setting. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects models, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The present meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251090090). Results: Fifteen RCTs including 9979 patients were included. In the overall analysis, PD-1 inhibitors were associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66–0.86) compared with control treatments. In the unresectable or metastatic setting, progression-free survival (PFS) was also significantly improved (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49–0.76). Survival benefits were observed in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors, with improved PFS in PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48–0.83) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44–0.77), as well as improved OS in PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67–0.93), without evidence of effect modification by PD-L1 expression. PD-1 inhibitor-based regimens were not associated with a statistically significant increase in grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.71–1.79); however, heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 96.0%). Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitor-based therapies significantly improve survival outcomes in advanced melanoma across PD-L1 subgroups. No clear evidence of differential treatment benefit according to PD-L1 expression was observed, suggesting limited utility as a standalone predictive biomarker. Further studies integrating molecular and immune profiling are warranted to optimize individualized treatment selection.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of Tübingen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.