Comparative Analysis of Promising Hydrophobic Polymers for Biomedical Applications: Mechanical Properties and Susceptibility to Lipid-Induced Plasticization

Recent advances in biocompatible elastomeric polymers have expanded the design possibilities for long-term implantable medical devices, yet systematic comparison across relevant candidate families remain limited. Herein, we present a comparative evaluation of four promising biomedical elastomers: a siloxane-based polyurethane (Si–PU), a polyisobutylene-based polyurethane (PIB–PU), cross-linked poly(styrene- block -isobutylene- block -styrene) (xSIBS), and poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) (SEBS). Tensile mechanical properties, viscoelastic relaxation, creep behavior, fracture toughness, thrombogenicity, and lipid-induced property deterioration were assessed to elucidate structure–property relationships relevant to blood-contacting applications. Marked differences in stiffness, deformation kinetics, and fracture energy were observed across the materials, reflecting variations in segmental chemistry, phase morphology, and network connectivity. For example, the styrene-dominant SEBS demonstrated greater stiffness than the urethane-dominant PIB–PU (65.70 MPa ± 12.63 MPa vs 8.13 MPa ± 0.36 MPa), while simultaneously demonstrating lower fracture toughness (10.89 kJ/m 2 ± 1.55 kJ/m 2 vs 50.39 kJ/m 2 ± 5.32 kJ/m 2 ). Following lipid immersion, Si–PU, PIB–PU, and xSIBS demonstrated measurable swelling (1.86 ± 0.08, 1.25 ± 0.00, and 1.07 ± 0.03, respectively) and mechanical softening (e.g., a 32.29% ± 6.13% toughness decrease for Si–PU) while SEBS remained unaffected. Lipid susceptibility increased in the order SEBS → xSIBS → PIB–PU → Si–PU, with mechanical responses theorized to be a result of lipid-mediated plasticization disrupting intermolecular domains. Collectively, these findings establish a preliminary framework linking molecular composition and viscoelastic behavior to environmental susceptibility, highlighting critical trade-offs in the design of implantable medical devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Polymer Materials
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.6c00585
Primary Topic
Polymer Science and PVC
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Promising Hydrophobic Polymers for Biomedical Applications: Mechanical Properties and Susceptibility to Lipid-Induced Plasticization

Leonard Pinchuk, Marta Serrani, Sina Naficy, Joanna Stasiak et al.
ACS Applied Polymer Materials
Polymer Science and PVC
article

Comparative Analysis of Promising Hydrophobic Polymers for Biomedical Applications: Mechanical Properties and Susceptibility to Lipid-Induced Plasticization

Leonard Pinchuk, Marta Serrani, Sina Naficy, Joanna Stasiak, Jacopo Emilio Giaretta, James M. Eagan, Matthew Crago, Yuliana Ospina-Yepes, Arsalaan N. Pathan, Geoff D. Moggridge
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in biocompatible elastomeric polymers have expanded the design possibilities for long-term implantable medical devices, yet systematic comparison across relevant candidate families remain limited. Herein, we present a comparative evaluation of four promising biomedical elastomers: a siloxane-based polyurethane (Si–PU), a polyisobutylene-based polyurethane (PIB–PU), cross-linked poly(styrene- block -isobutylene- block -styrene) (xSIBS), and poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) (SEBS). Tensile mechanical properties, viscoelastic relaxation, creep behavior, fracture toughness, thrombogenicity, and lipid-induced property deterioration were assessed to elucidate structure–property relationships relevant to blood-contacting applications. Marked differences in stiffness, deformation kinetics, and fracture energy were observed across the materials, reflecting variations in segmental chemistry, phase morphology, and network connectivity. For example, the styrene-dominant SEBS demonstrated greater stiffness than the urethane-dominant PIB–PU (65.70 MPa ± 12.63 MPa vs 8.13 MPa ± 0.36 MPa), while simultaneously demonstrating lower fracture toughness (10.89 kJ/m 2 ± 1.55 kJ/m 2 vs 50.39 kJ/m 2 ± 5.32 kJ/m 2 ). Following lipid immersion, Si–PU, PIB–PU, and xSIBS demonstrated measurable swelling (1.86 ± 0.08, 1.25 ± 0.00, and 1.07 ± 0.03, respectively) and mechanical softening (e.g., a 32.29% ± 6.13% toughness decrease for Si–PU) while SEBS remained unaffected. Lipid susceptibility increased in the order SEBS → xSIBS → PIB–PU → Si–PU, with mechanical responses theorized to be a result of lipid-mediated plasticization disrupting intermolecular domains. Collectively, these findings establish a preliminary framework linking molecular composition and viscoelastic behavior to environmental susceptibility, highlighting critical trade-offs in the design of implantable medical devices.

ACS Applied Polymer Materials
University of Akron (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), The University of Sydney (AU), Durham University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Santen (Finland) (FI), Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics (BY)
American Heart Association, National Institute for Health and Care Research, NSW Health, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Australian Research Council, Medical Research Future Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Polymer Science and PVC
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.