Exploring learning style preferences of Yemeni EFL learners: the impact of gender, age, and academic qualification

Abstract This paper examines the patterns and choices of English as a foreign language (EFL) learner concerning their learning styles and how learners’ demographics, specifically gender, age, and academic qualifications, affect their preferences. It highlights the preferred learning styles of Yemeni students learning English as a foreign language, a group that has not been extensively studied. The participants ( n = 205) were surveyed using a Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ), which evaluates six major forms of learning: visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, group, and individual learning. The results show that Yemeni EFL students perform best with kinesthetic and tactile learning styles, which indicates that they benefit most from physical and participatory activities. There was a slight preference for group and auditory styles of learning. Visual and individual learning styles were the least favored. Furthermore, statistical tests showed that the variables of gender, age, and academic qualifications were insignificant concerning the preference of learning style. Ultimately, the results indicate that these students prefer interactive and hands-on learning methods, which differ from the traditional lecture-based approaches often found in classrooms. This suggests the need for educators to adjust teaching techniques and curricula to align more closely with students’ preferences in similar educational settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-026-00440-6
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring learning style preferences of Yemeni EFL learners: the impact of gender, age, and academic qualification

Aatif Mohammed, Xu Wen
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Exploring learning style preferences of Yemeni EFL learners: the impact of gender, age, and academic qualification

Aatif Mohammed, Xu Wen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the patterns and choices of English as a foreign language (EFL) learner concerning their learning styles and how learners’ demographics, specifically gender, age, and academic qualifications, affect their preferences. It highlights the preferred learning styles of Yemeni students learning English as a foreign language, a group that has not been extensively studied. The participants ( n = 205) were surveyed using a Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ), which evaluates six major forms of learning: visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, group, and individual learning. The results show that Yemeni EFL students perform best with kinesthetic and tactile learning styles, which indicates that they benefit most from physical and participatory activities. There was a slight preference for group and auditory styles of learning. Visual and individual learning styles were the least favored. Furthermore, statistical tests showed that the variables of gender, age, and academic qualifications were insignificant concerning the preference of learning style. Ultimately, the results indicate that these students prefer interactive and hands-on learning methods, which differ from the traditional lecture-based approaches often found in classrooms. This suggests the need for educators to adjust teaching techniques and curricula to align more closely with students’ preferences in similar educational settings.

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language EducationVol. 11(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.