An assessment of the limitations of large language models in <scp>CRW</scp> reactive group identification

Abstract Chemical incompatibility management in process safety depends on accurate chemical reactive group identification. When chemicals are not covered by existing databases, classification often relies on expert judgment and may be inconsistent. This study was conducted based on 68 commonly used petrochemical products and the reactive group list embedded in the Chemical Reactivity Worksheet (CRW) database. Using this reference framework, the accuracy of six large language models (LLM) in identifying chemical reactive groups was systematically evaluated. The tests used repeated trials and two evaluation criteria: correct number of reactive groups and correct category assignment. The conclusion is that performance is only moderate; the models frequently underestimate or misclassify reactive groups, and outputs are not stable enough for safety‐critical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.70069
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An assessment of the limitations of large language models in CRW reactive group identification

Yen‐Ju Lu, Chen‐Hua Wang
Process Safety Progress
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

An assessment of the limitations of large language models in CRW reactive group identification

Yen‐Ju Lu, Chen‐Hua Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chemical incompatibility management in process safety depends on accurate chemical reactive group identification. When chemicals are not covered by existing databases, classification often relies on expert judgment and may be inconsistent. This study was conducted based on 68 commonly used petrochemical products and the reactive group list embedded in the Chemical Reactivity Worksheet (CRW) database. Using this reference framework, the accuracy of six large language models (LLM) in identifying chemical reactive groups was systematically evaluated. The tests used repeated trials and two evaluation criteria: correct number of reactive groups and correct category assignment. The conclusion is that performance is only moderate; the models frequently underestimate or misclassify reactive groups, and outputs are not stable enough for safety‐critical use.

Process Safety Progress
National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology (TW), University of Science and Technology (YE), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.