FEED Europe: An Exploratory Study of Food Insecurity Screening and Referral Practices of Dietitians Practicing in Europe

Background/Objectives: Household food insecurity is a modifiable social determinant of health with important implications for diet quality and health outcomes. Dietitians are well positioned to identify and respond to food insecurity; however, little is known about how this is addressed in routine dietetic practice across Europe. This exploratory study examined food insecurity screening and response practices among dietitians practicing in Europe and examined associated correlates using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B). Methods: An online cross-sectional survey informed by the COM-B framework was distributed through the European Federation of Associations of Dietitians’ institutional communication channels between February and June 2024. Participants were recruited using a voluntary, convenience-based sampling strategy through professional networks and social media dissemination. A total of 148 dietitians practicing in European countries responded. The questionnaire assessed routine food insecurity screening practices, COM-B correlates, perceived barriers, actions taken following identification, and learning needs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and open-ended responses were used illustratively to contextualise reported practices. Results: Food insecurity screening was not systematically embedded in routine dietetic practice, with 11.6% of respondents reporting routine screening and 30.2% not asking about food insecurity. Identification of food insecurity did not consistently translate into follow-up action, and responses were predominantly referral-based rather than involving direct material support. While capability and motivation to address food insecurity were generally high, opportunity-related factors—such as time constraints, limited organisational support, and unclear referral pathways—emerged as the main barriers shaping professional behaviour. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across practice settings. Conclusions: In this sample of dietitians practicing in Europe, food insecurity screening and response were variable and often constrained by organisational and contextual factors. These findings highlight the need for system-level support and practice-oriented training to facilitate the integration of food insecurity into routine dietetic care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dietetics
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics5020036
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FEED Europe: An Exploratory Study of Food Insecurity Screening and Referral Practices of Dietitians Practicing in Europe

Elwira Gliwska, Raimón Milà, Amanda Avery, Elena Carrillo Álvarez et al.
Dietetics
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

FEED Europe: An Exploratory Study of Food Insecurity Screening and Referral Practices of Dietitians Practicing in Europe

Elwira Gliwska, Raimón Milà, Amanda Avery, Elena Carrillo Álvarez, Katarzyna Janiszewska, Júlia Muñoz-Martinez
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Household food insecurity is a modifiable social determinant of health with important implications for diet quality and health outcomes. Dietitians are well positioned to identify and respond to food insecurity; however, little is known about how this is addressed in routine dietetic practice across Europe. This exploratory study examined food insecurity screening and response practices among dietitians practicing in Europe and examined associated correlates using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B). Methods: An online cross-sectional survey informed by the COM-B framework was distributed through the European Federation of Associations of Dietitians’ institutional communication channels between February and June 2024. Participants were recruited using a voluntary, convenience-based sampling strategy through professional networks and social media dissemination. A total of 148 dietitians practicing in European countries responded. The questionnaire assessed routine food insecurity screening practices, COM-B correlates, perceived barriers, actions taken following identification, and learning needs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and open-ended responses were used illustratively to contextualise reported practices. Results: Food insecurity screening was not systematically embedded in routine dietetic practice, with 11.6% of respondents reporting routine screening and 30.2% not asking about food insecurity. Identification of food insecurity did not consistently translate into follow-up action, and responses were predominantly referral-based rather than involving direct material support. While capability and motivation to address food insecurity were generally high, opportunity-related factors—such as time constraints, limited organisational support, and unclear referral pathways—emerged as the main barriers shaping professional behaviour. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across practice settings. Conclusions: In this sample of dietitians practicing in Europe, food insecurity screening and response were variable and often constrained by organisational and contextual factors. These findings highlight the need for system-level support and practice-oriented training to facilitate the integration of food insecurity into routine dietetic care.

DieteticsVol. 5(2)
University of Nottingham (GB), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Universitat Ramon Llull
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.