Screenshots, SIM Cards, and Household Governance: Digital Coercive Control and Evidence Making in Uganda

Tech facilitated intimate partner violence is increasingly embedded in everyday Ugandan digital life, including phone confiscation, SIM card control, WhatsApp monitoring, coerced "proof," mobile money coercion, and reputational threats. This article examines digital coercive control as household governance and analyses how survivors and frontline supporters produce evidence under threat, focusing on the practical work of assembling "evidence packages" that may include screenshots, voice notes, timelines, and witnesses. Drawing on comparative qualitative research across an informal settlement in Kampala, a regional town, and a rural district with strong kin governance, the analysis shows how digital control reorganizes access to communication and money, how evidence making is shaped by safety calculations and stigma, and how institutions unevenly validate or dismiss digital traces. The article contributes to the sociology of intimate partner violence by showing that evidentiary credibility is socially distributed: the same digital trace may be read as proof, gossip, provocation, shame, or insufficient evidence depending on the survivor's social position, available intermediaries, and institutional venue. The article advances a low-resource approach to safer evidence intake across policing, health care, and community mediation, emphasizing patterned coercive control and survivor safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sociology
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70140
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screenshots, SIM Cards, and Household Governance: Digital Coercive Control and Evidence Making in Uganda

Charles Namatovu
British Journal of Sociology
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Screenshots, SIM Cards, and Household Governance: Digital Coercive Control and Evidence Making in Uganda

Charles Namatovu
article en

Abstract

Tech facilitated intimate partner violence is increasingly embedded in everyday Ugandan digital life, including phone confiscation, SIM card control, WhatsApp monitoring, coerced "proof," mobile money coercion, and reputational threats. This article examines digital coercive control as household governance and analyses how survivors and frontline supporters produce evidence under threat, focusing on the practical work of assembling "evidence packages" that may include screenshots, voice notes, timelines, and witnesses. Drawing on comparative qualitative research across an informal settlement in Kampala, a regional town, and a rural district with strong kin governance, the analysis shows how digital control reorganizes access to communication and money, how evidence making is shaped by safety calculations and stigma, and how institutions unevenly validate or dismiss digital traces. The article contributes to the sociology of intimate partner violence by showing that evidentiary credibility is socially distributed: the same digital trace may be read as proof, gossip, provocation, shame, or insufficient evidence depending on the survivor's social position, available intermediaries, and institutional venue. The article advances a low-resource approach to safer evidence intake across policing, health care, and community mediation, emphasizing patterned coercive control and survivor safety.

British Journal of Sociology
Kyambogo University (UG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.