Analytical Validation of Low-Cost Optical Sensors for Freshwater Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Current Gaps and a Proposed Framework

Low-cost optical sensors have emerged as promising tools for in situ freshwater quality monitoring, offering the potential to expand spatial and temporal data coverage, particularly in community-based monitoring projects. However, despite rapid technological development of low-cost optical sensors, analytical validation practices of these devices remain poorly studied. This study aims to systematically and critically assess analytical validation practices applied to low-cost optical sensors based on absorbance, fluorescence, colorimetry, and light scattering, potentially designed for community-based freshwater monitoring. A total of 40 studies were analysed to evaluate how key analytical performance parameters, including sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and repeatability, as well as comparison with reference methods or benchtop instruments, were assessed and reported in relation to established validation guidelines. The analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity and critical gaps in validation approaches. While most studies report sensitivity metrics such as limits of detection and quantification, comprehensive evaluation of key analytical parameters such as accuracy, precision, and reproducibility was often limited. The reliance on single calibration experiments and high determination coefficients (R2) frequently overestimates sensor performance. The lack of open-source materials further limits reproducibility and deployment: essential information such as design files, calibration procedures, and open-source resources is often incomplete or unavailable. To address these limitations, we propose a structured framework for validation and reporting that integrates established analytical guidelines with the practicalities of low-cost sensor development. Adoption of this approach would enable more consistent performance evaluation, improving reproducibility and facilitating comparison across studies and devices. Overall, strengthening analytical validation and reporting practices is essential to support the transition of low-cost optical sensors from proof-of-concept systems to reliable analytical devices for freshwater quality monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26123846
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Validation of Low-Cost Optical Sensors for Freshwater Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Current Gaps and a Proposed Framework

Óscar González, Steven Loiselle, Luisa Galgani, Gabriella Tamasi et al.
Sensors
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

Analytical Validation of Low-Cost Optical Sensors for Freshwater Monitoring: A Scoping Review of Current Gaps and a Proposed Framework

Óscar González, Steven Loiselle, Luisa Galgani, Gabriella Tamasi, Amedeo Boldrini, Alessio Polvani, Xinyu Liu, Anna Witter, Riccardo Gaetano Cirrone, Francesco Vesprini
article en

Abstract

Low-cost optical sensors have emerged as promising tools for in situ freshwater quality monitoring, offering the potential to expand spatial and temporal data coverage, particularly in community-based monitoring projects. However, despite rapid technological development of low-cost optical sensors, analytical validation practices of these devices remain poorly studied. This study aims to systematically and critically assess analytical validation practices applied to low-cost optical sensors based on absorbance, fluorescence, colorimetry, and light scattering, potentially designed for community-based freshwater monitoring. A total of 40 studies were analysed to evaluate how key analytical performance parameters, including sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and repeatability, as well as comparison with reference methods or benchtop instruments, were assessed and reported in relation to established validation guidelines. The analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity and critical gaps in validation approaches. While most studies report sensitivity metrics such as limits of detection and quantification, comprehensive evaluation of key analytical parameters such as accuracy, precision, and reproducibility was often limited. The reliance on single calibration experiments and high determination coefficients (R2) frequently overestimates sensor performance. The lack of open-source materials further limits reproducibility and deployment: essential information such as design files, calibration procedures, and open-source resources is often incomplete or unavailable. To address these limitations, we propose a structured framework for validation and reporting that integrates established analytical guidelines with the practicalities of low-cost sensor development. Adoption of this approach would enable more consistent performance evaluation, improving reproducibility and facilitating comparison across studies and devices. Overall, strengthening analytical validation and reporting practices is essential to support the transition of low-cost optical sensors from proof-of-concept systems to reliable analytical devices for freshwater quality monitoring.

SensorsVol. 26(12)
University of Siena (IT), Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (ES), Earthwatch Europe (GB), University of Florence (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.