Rethinking Public Support for Body-Worn Cameras: Race, Ethnicity, and Context

This study revisits public support for the use of body-worn cameras (BWCs) in policing, with a specific focus on examining the multifaceted role of race and ethnicity. We test two models in which race and ethnicity shape attitudes toward BWCs by contextualizing two prominent factors: instrumental concern and procedural justice. Using a nationally representative sample of 3,306 U.S. adults, we examine the indirect effect of race and ethnicity through path analysis (generalized structural equation modeling [GSEM]) and their moderating effects with OLS regression. Compared to Whites, African Americans expressed greater skepticism about BWCs’ ability to reduce police use of excessive force, which in turn lowered their support for BWCs. Both African Americans and Hispanic/Latino respondents viewed the police as less procedurally just, further reducing BWC support. Moreover, the positive association between procedural justice and BWC support was weaker among African Americans than among Whites. Our findings highlight the significance and multifaceted role of race and ethnicity in shaping public perceptions of police reforms such as BWCs. In this context, building trust in minority communities requires open communication, genuine collaboration, and a clear acknowledgment of past injustices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Race and Justice
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687261460876
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Public Support for Body-Worn Cameras: Race, Ethnicity, and Context

Bitna Kim, Jangwon Kim
Race and Justice
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Rethinking Public Support for Body-Worn Cameras: Race, Ethnicity, and Context

Bitna Kim, Jangwon Kim
article en

Abstract

This study revisits public support for the use of body-worn cameras (BWCs) in policing, with a specific focus on examining the multifaceted role of race and ethnicity. We test two models in which race and ethnicity shape attitudes toward BWCs by contextualizing two prominent factors: instrumental concern and procedural justice. Using a nationally representative sample of 3,306 U.S. adults, we examine the indirect effect of race and ethnicity through path analysis (generalized structural equation modeling [GSEM]) and their moderating effects with OLS regression. Compared to Whites, African Americans expressed greater skepticism about BWCs’ ability to reduce police use of excessive force, which in turn lowered their support for BWCs. Both African Americans and Hispanic/Latino respondents viewed the police as less procedurally just, further reducing BWC support. Moreover, the positive association between procedural justice and BWC support was weaker among African Americans than among Whites. Our findings highlight the significance and multifaceted role of race and ethnicity in shaping public perceptions of police reforms such as BWCs. In this context, building trust in minority communities requires open communication, genuine collaboration, and a clear acknowledgment of past injustices.

Race and Justice
Sam Houston State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.