GERONTOTECHNOLOGIJŲ MODELIŲ TAIKYMO PRIEIGA ERICH’O FROMM’O TEORIJOS „TURĖTI AR BŪTI?“ PERSPEKTYVOJE

The article examines classic technology acceptance models such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), which allow the relatively accurate prediction of technology use intentions, but do not always explain why some technologies, despite their perceived usefulness, remain unaccepted or are used differently than expected. The article assumes that this limitation is related to the logic of instrumental rationality underlying classic technology acceptance models. The study employs conceptual analysis by reconstructing the main constructs of technology acceptance models and interpreting them through Erich Fromm’s distinction between having and being. The analysis has revealed that classic technology acceptance models predominantly reflect a relationship with technology characteristic of the ‘having’ orientation, grounded in the logic of functionality, control and efficiency. The article contributes to technology acceptance theory by offering an interpretative extension of classic models and a conceptual foundation for a future methodology of analysing life orientations in gerontotechnology research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltai
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v96i1.2802
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GERONTOTECHNOLOGIJŲ MODELIŲ TAIKYMO PRIEIGA ERICH’O FROMM’O TEORIJOS „TURĖTI AR BŪTI?“ PERSPEKTYVOJE

Jonas Tilvikas
Tiltai
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

GERONTOTECHNOLOGIJŲ MODELIŲ TAIKYMO PRIEIGA ERICH’O FROMM’O TEORIJOS „TURĖTI AR BŪTI?“ PERSPEKTYVOJE

Jonas Tilvikas
article en

Abstract

The article examines classic technology acceptance models such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), which allow the relatively accurate prediction of technology use intentions, but do not always explain why some technologies, despite their perceived usefulness, remain unaccepted or are used differently than expected. The article assumes that this limitation is related to the logic of instrumental rationality underlying classic technology acceptance models. The study employs conceptual analysis by reconstructing the main constructs of technology acceptance models and interpreting them through Erich Fromm’s distinction between having and being. The analysis has revealed that classic technology acceptance models predominantly reflect a relationship with technology characteristic of the ‘having’ orientation, grounded in the logic of functionality, control and efficiency. The article contributes to technology acceptance theory by offering an interpretative extension of classic models and a conceptual foundation for a future methodology of analysing life orientations in gerontotechnology research.

Tiltai
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.