How to trust learned loop amplitudes

Higher-order theory predictions are crucial for the precision LHC program, but the time-consuming amplitude evaluation challenges the corresponding Monte-Carlo simulations. Machine-learned amplitude surrogates can resolve this problem, if we can guarantee their precision over the entire phase space. First, we show that our surrogates provide a calibrated learned uncertainty, even for non-Gaussian systematics; second, we describe how less accurate phase space regions can be identified; third, we demonstrate how the precision in these regions can be improved reliably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SciPost Physics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.20.6.165
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to trust learned loop amplitudes

Henning Bahl, Gudrun Heinrich, J. Braun, Rebecca Revelli et al.
SciPost Physics
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

How to trust learned loop amplitudes

Henning Bahl, Gudrun Heinrich, J. Braun, Rebecca Revelli, Tilman Plehn
article en

Abstract

Higher-order theory predictions are crucial for the precision LHC program, but the time-consuming amplitude evaluation challenges the corresponding Monte-Carlo simulations. Machine-learned amplitude surrogates can resolve this problem, if we can guarantee their precision over the entire phase space. First, we show that our surrogates provide a calibrated learned uncertainty, even for non-Gaussian systematics; second, we describe how less accurate phase space regions can be identified; third, we demonstrate how the precision in these regions can be improved reliably.

SciPost PhysicsVol. 20(6)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Turin (IT)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.