The “Investmentification” of Deep-Seabed Mining in the Area: How Investment Law Concepts Are Shaping the Law of the Sea

This article examines the growing influence of international investment law on the legal regime governing deep-seabed mining under Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It argues that this process of “investmentification” has emerged gradually through the interaction of treaty provisions, International Seabed Authority contractual practice, and national sponsorship agreements. While these developments enhance predictability for private operators, they also introduce new pressures on the regulatory discretion of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and sponsoring states, raising questions about how stability commitments can be reconciled with the collective and environmental obligations embedded in the common heritage of humankind (CHM). By analyzing the legal architecture of UNCLOS, the evolution of ISA contracts, and the recent contractualization of sponsorship regimes, the article explores how investment law logics shape authority, risk allocation, and environmental governance in the Area, and considers how these dynamics might be aligned with the CHM principle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean Development & International Law
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2026.2685495
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Investmentification” of Deep-Seabed Mining in the Area: How Investment Law Concepts Are Shaping the Law of the Sea

Nicolò Andreotti
Ocean Development & International Law
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The “Investmentification” of Deep-Seabed Mining in the Area: How Investment Law Concepts Are Shaping the Law of the Sea

Nicolò Andreotti
article en

Abstract

This article examines the growing influence of international investment law on the legal regime governing deep-seabed mining under Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It argues that this process of “investmentification” has emerged gradually through the interaction of treaty provisions, International Seabed Authority contractual practice, and national sponsorship agreements. While these developments enhance predictability for private operators, they also introduce new pressures on the regulatory discretion of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and sponsoring states, raising questions about how stability commitments can be reconciled with the collective and environmental obligations embedded in the common heritage of humankind (CHM). By analyzing the legal architecture of UNCLOS, the evolution of ISA contracts, and the recent contractualization of sponsorship regimes, the article explores how investment law logics shape authority, risk allocation, and environmental governance in the Area, and considers how these dynamics might be aligned with the CHM principle.

Ocean Development & International Law
Center for International Environmental Law (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.