Negative-pressure assistance for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography localization in lung tumor resection: comparative study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of wound negative-pressure-assisted (NPA) localization in facilitating pulmonary expansion during intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) localization for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study included 55 consecutive patients who underwent wedge resection for small lung tumors using uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with CBCT localization between June 2022 and December 2024. Patients were grouped by localization technique: Group 1 received NPA and Group 2 did not. Primary outcomes were CBCT localization workflow time and CBCT-defined incomplete lung expansion/residual pleural air (CTILA) occurrence. Univariate comparisons used Welch's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with CTILA, and multivariable linear regression analyzed CBCT localization workflow time. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. CBCT localization workflow time was significantly shorter in Group 1 than in Group 2 (17.31 ± 7.13 vs. 25.69 ± 9.57 min; mean difference - 8.38 min; 95% CI - 13.00 to - 3.76; p = 0.0007; Hedges' g = - 0.987). CTILA occurred less frequently in Group 1 (3/29, 10.3%) than in Group 2 (13/26, 50.0%) (risk difference - 39.7%, 95% CI - 61.8% to - 17.5%; Fisher's exact p = 0.0023; odds ratio 8.67). In a multivariable model adjusted for airway management type, smoking exposure, and nodule depth, the non-NPA group remained associated with a higher likelihood of CBCT-defined incomplete lung expansion/residual pleural air (adjusted OR 7.56, 95% CI 1.03-55.61; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: NPA localization was associated with shorter CBCT localization workflow time and a lower rate of CTILA during intraoperative CBCT localization for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04446-6
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative-pressure assistance for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography localization in lung tumor resection: comparative study

Shuenn‐Wen Kuo, Pei‐Ming Huang
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Negative-pressure assistance for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography localization in lung tumor resection: comparative study

Shuenn‐Wen Kuo, Pei‐Ming Huang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of wound negative-pressure-assisted (NPA) localization in facilitating pulmonary expansion during intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) localization for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study included 55 consecutive patients who underwent wedge resection for small lung tumors using uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with CBCT localization between June 2022 and December 2024. Patients were grouped by localization technique: Group 1 received NPA and Group 2 did not. Primary outcomes were CBCT localization workflow time and CBCT-defined incomplete lung expansion/residual pleural air (CTILA) occurrence. Univariate comparisons used Welch's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with CTILA, and multivariable linear regression analyzed CBCT localization workflow time. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. CBCT localization workflow time was significantly shorter in Group 1 than in Group 2 (17.31 ± 7.13 vs. 25.69 ± 9.57 min; mean difference - 8.38 min; 95% CI - 13.00 to - 3.76; p = 0.0007; Hedges' g = - 0.987). CTILA occurred less frequently in Group 1 (3/29, 10.3%) than in Group 2 (13/26, 50.0%) (risk difference - 39.7%, 95% CI - 61.8% to - 17.5%; Fisher's exact p = 0.0023; odds ratio 8.67). In a multivariable model adjusted for airway management type, smoking exposure, and nodule depth, the non-NPA group remained associated with a higher likelihood of CBCT-defined incomplete lung expansion/residual pleural air (adjusted OR 7.56, 95% CI 1.03-55.61; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: NPA localization was associated with shorter CBCT localization workflow time and a lower rate of CTILA during intraoperative CBCT localization for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules.

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.