Defending Maritain on Church and State from the Perspective of the Nature–Grace Principle

Abstract: Every Catholic theologian is aware of the Grundaxiom that grace does not destroy nature but, rather, presupposes and perfects it by healing and elevating it. However, it seems that many forgot to pay attention to the implications of this principle for certain debates in recent centuries, such as what ought to be the proper relationship between the Church, primarily considered in terms of its hierarchical authority, and civil society (especially, the modern nation-state). Leaving aside the details of the relevant debates in political philosophy and theology as well as the polemics regarding interpretation of the Second Vatican Council, this essay purports to make a simple application of this nature–grace principle (as found in perennial Christian intellectual tradition) to the project of reconciling the development of secular society with a theology that maintains the essential rights of the Church in the world, which characterized much of Jacques Maritain’s career. In response to Thomas Pink’s critique especially, I defend Maritain’s pertinent proposal on the basis of the view that ecclesiastical and civil realities ought to be distinguished and related to each other in a way that mirrors the relationship between the supernatural and natural orders of reality as such.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2026.a992681
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending Maritain on Church and State from the Perspective of the Nature–Grace Principle

Joshua R. Brotherton
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Defending Maritain on Church and State from the Perspective of the Nature–Grace Principle

Joshua R. Brotherton
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Every Catholic theologian is aware of the Grundaxiom that grace does not destroy nature but, rather, presupposes and perfects it by healing and elevating it. However, it seems that many forgot to pay attention to the implications of this principle for certain debates in recent centuries, such as what ought to be the proper relationship between the Church, primarily considered in terms of its hierarchical authority, and civil society (especially, the modern nation-state). Leaving aside the details of the relevant debates in political philosophy and theology as well as the polemics regarding interpretation of the Second Vatican Council, this essay purports to make a simple application of this nature–grace principle (as found in perennial Christian intellectual tradition) to the project of reconciling the development of secular society with a theology that maintains the essential rights of the Church in the world, which characterized much of Jacques Maritain’s career. In response to Thomas Pink’s critique especially, I defend Maritain’s pertinent proposal on the basis of the view that ecclesiastical and civil realities ought to be distinguished and related to each other in a way that mirrors the relationship between the supernatural and natural orders of reality as such.

The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly ReviewVol. 90(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.