MAURO BOIANOVSKY ON SAMUELSONIAN DYNAMICS AND THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MARKET PROCESSES

In his article “Paul Samuelson’s Ways to Macroeconomic Dynamics” Mauro Boianovsky has provided an account of the evolution of Samuelson’s attempts to construct a dynamic theory that, because of Samuelson’s centrality to modern economics, verges on being an account of the history of recent thought on the subject. This paper argues that Samuelson’s views should be related not only to the formal dynamic modeling of Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen but also to the verbal accounts of dynamics and market processes found in work by Alfred Marshall, John Maurice Clark, Edward Chamberlin, and Joseph Schumpeter that he had studied very carefully. Broadening our perspective in this way helps make sense of some otherwise puzzling features of Samuelson’s economics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1053837226101321
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MAURO BOIANOVSKY ON SAMUELSONIAN DYNAMICS AND THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MARKET PROCESSES

Roger E. Backhouse
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

MAURO BOIANOVSKY ON SAMUELSONIAN DYNAMICS AND THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF MARKET PROCESSES

Roger E. Backhouse
article en

Abstract

In his article “Paul Samuelson’s Ways to Macroeconomic Dynamics” Mauro Boianovsky has provided an account of the evolution of Samuelson’s attempts to construct a dynamic theory that, because of Samuelson’s centrality to modern economics, verges on being an account of the history of recent thought on the subject. This paper argues that Samuelson’s views should be related not only to the formal dynamic modeling of Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen but also to the verbal accounts of dynamics and market processes found in work by Alfred Marshall, John Maurice Clark, Edward Chamberlin, and Joseph Schumpeter that he had studied very carefully. Broadening our perspective in this way helps make sense of some otherwise puzzling features of Samuelson’s economics.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.