Right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy and full sternotomy approaches for Wheat procedure: a propensity-matched comparison

BACKGROUND: As the prevalence and technological advancements of minimally invasive heart surgery continue to increase, aortic valve replacement(AVR) via right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) has matured, however, problems associated with Wheat's procedure (replacement of the ascending aorta(AAR) concomitant AVR) via RAMT approach have not been reported. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical quality, postoperative outcomes, and patient safety in patients undergoing Wheat's procedure via Full sternotomy (FS) versus RAMT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 163 patients who underwent Wheat procedure between January 2022 and December 2024. Out of the 163 patients, 59 underwent the Wheat procedure via a right anterior minimally invasive incision. After 1:1 propensity score matching, by comparing various intraoperative and postoperative indicators, the outcomes of patients undergoing RAMT and FS were compared. RESULTS: Propensity scores identified 43 patients per group with similar baseline profiles. The results from the propensity-matched cohort are as follows. Although patients in RAMT group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (RAMT 167 ± 57 vs FS 141 ± 40 min; P = 0.04) and cross-clamp (RAMT 128 ± 39 vs FS 110 ± 29 min; P = 0.04) time, they experienced reduced intraoperative blood loss (RAMT 317 ± 147 vs FS 456 ± 229 ml; P = 0.005). No patients in the RAMT group required intraoperative conversion to Full sternotomy. There was no statistically difference in the in-hospital mortality between the two groups (0% and 0% in RAMT and FS, respectively). RAMT was correlated with a reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (RAMT 3 [7.0%] vs FS 13 [23.3%]; P = 0.04). Receiving RAMT can lead to a reduction in postoperative NRS pain scores and an earlier discharge for patients. RAMT not only enables shorter incisions (RAMT 6.0 cm vs FS 15.2 cm; P < 0.001) but also has no impact on the size or type of the artificial valve or vessel implanted, thereby ensuring that the surgical effection is non-inferior to the FS group. CONCLUSIONS: In the Wheat procedure, the perioperative outcomes of RAMT closely resemble those of full sternotomy, and may be transferred in the field of cardiac surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04408-y
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy and full sternotomy approaches for Wheat procedure: a propensity-matched comparison

Xuebiao Li, Minjian Kong, Dongdong Wei, Aiqiang Dong et al.
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

Right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy and full sternotomy approaches for Wheat procedure: a propensity-matched comparison

Xuebiao Li, Minjian Kong, Dongdong Wei, Aiqiang Dong, Xian Zhu, Yupeng Sun
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the prevalence and technological advancements of minimally invasive heart surgery continue to increase, aortic valve replacement(AVR) via right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) has matured, however, problems associated with Wheat's procedure (replacement of the ascending aorta(AAR) concomitant AVR) via RAMT approach have not been reported. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical quality, postoperative outcomes, and patient safety in patients undergoing Wheat's procedure via Full sternotomy (FS) versus RAMT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 163 patients who underwent Wheat procedure between January 2022 and December 2024. Out of the 163 patients, 59 underwent the Wheat procedure via a right anterior minimally invasive incision. After 1:1 propensity score matching, by comparing various intraoperative and postoperative indicators, the outcomes of patients undergoing RAMT and FS were compared. RESULTS: Propensity scores identified 43 patients per group with similar baseline profiles. The results from the propensity-matched cohort are as follows. Although patients in RAMT group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (RAMT 167 ± 57 vs FS 141 ± 40 min; P = 0.04) and cross-clamp (RAMT 128 ± 39 vs FS 110 ± 29 min; P = 0.04) time, they experienced reduced intraoperative blood loss (RAMT 317 ± 147 vs FS 456 ± 229 ml; P = 0.005). No patients in the RAMT group required intraoperative conversion to Full sternotomy. There was no statistically difference in the in-hospital mortality between the two groups (0% and 0% in RAMT and FS, respectively). RAMT was correlated with a reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (RAMT 3 [7.0%] vs FS 13 [23.3%]; P = 0.04). Receiving RAMT can lead to a reduction in postoperative NRS pain scores and an earlier discharge for patients. RAMT not only enables shorter incisions (RAMT 6.0 cm vs FS 15.2 cm; P < 0.001) but also has no impact on the size or type of the artificial valve or vessel implanted, thereby ensuring that the surgical effection is non-inferior to the FS group. CONCLUSIONS: In the Wheat procedure, the perioperative outcomes of RAMT closely resemble those of full sternotomy, and may be transferred in the field of cardiac surgery.

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.