ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY OF USING A COMBINED IRRIGATION SYSTEM

The article emphasizes that irrigation is one of the key factors ensuring national food security, while sprinkler irrigation using center-pivot irrigation machines remains the most widespread irrigation method. It was established that, despite the high reliability, automation level, and operational convenience of such equipment, the circular operating principle results in a low land-use coefficient of approximately 78%, thereby reducing the overall economic efficiency of irrigation. To overcome this limitation, specialists of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Rainbow” developed a technical and technological solution within the framework of a state assignment. The proposed solution involves the combined operation of a center-pivot irrigation machine with a semi-stationary irrigation system consisting of sprinkler devices installed in non-irrigated areas and controlled via radio modules. The implementation of the combined system makes it possible to increase the land-use coefficient up to 98%. The aim of the study was to assess the investment efficiency of implementing the combined irrigation system. At the initial stage, capital investments required for the construction of conventional and combined irrigation systems on a typical 49-hectare field were determined. The conventional system included a center-pivot irrigation machine, a pumping station, and a pipeline network, whereas the combined system additionally incorporated a semi-stationary network with automated sprinkler control. Subsequently, the annual economic effect, payback period, and net present value (NPV) were calculated for the cultivation of various agricultural crops. The calculations were based on revenue generated from agricultural product sales. The results showed that the difference in capital investments between the conventional and combined irrigation systems amounted to RUB 5,126 million, while the irrigated area of the combined system increased by 25%. It was determined that the average annual economic effect from the implementation of the combined irrigation system reached RUB 7.4 million, with a payback period of approximately one year. Additional assessment using the net present value method demonstrated positive NPV values for all considered agricultural crops, averaging RUB 25.9 million, which confirms the high investment efficiency of implementing the combined irrigation system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow Economic Journal
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046x_2026_11_5_74
Primary Topic
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY OF USING A COMBINED IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Evgeniy Evseev, Alina Travkina, Nikolay Mischenko, Vladislav Travkin
Moscow Economic Journal
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
article

ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY OF USING A COMBINED IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Evgeniy Evseev, Alina Travkina, Nikolay Mischenko, Vladislav Travkin
article en

Abstract

The article emphasizes that irrigation is one of the key factors ensuring national food security, while sprinkler irrigation using center-pivot irrigation machines remains the most widespread irrigation method. It was established that, despite the high reliability, automation level, and operational convenience of such equipment, the circular operating principle results in a low land-use coefficient of approximately 78%, thereby reducing the overall economic efficiency of irrigation. To overcome this limitation, specialists of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Rainbow” developed a technical and technological solution within the framework of a state assignment. The proposed solution involves the combined operation of a center-pivot irrigation machine with a semi-stationary irrigation system consisting of sprinkler devices installed in non-irrigated areas and controlled via radio modules. The implementation of the combined system makes it possible to increase the land-use coefficient up to 98%. The aim of the study was to assess the investment efficiency of implementing the combined irrigation system. At the initial stage, capital investments required for the construction of conventional and combined irrigation systems on a typical 49-hectare field were determined. The conventional system included a center-pivot irrigation machine, a pumping station, and a pipeline network, whereas the combined system additionally incorporated a semi-stationary network with automated sprinkler control. Subsequently, the annual economic effect, payback period, and net present value (NPV) were calculated for the cultivation of various agricultural crops. The calculations were based on revenue generated from agricultural product sales. The results showed that the difference in capital investments between the conventional and combined irrigation systems amounted to RUB 5,126 million, while the irrigated area of the combined system increased by 25%. It was determined that the average annual economic effect from the implementation of the combined irrigation system reached RUB 7.4 million, with a payback period of approximately one year. Additional assessment using the net present value method demonstrated positive NPV values for all considered agricultural crops, averaging RUB 25.9 million, which confirms the high investment efficiency of implementing the combined irrigation system.

Moscow Economic Journal
International Humanitarian University (UA), All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Water Supply "Raduga" (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.