Development and Preliminary Validation of a Tool to Assess Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Switch Trials

Improving accrual to clinical trials is critical in oncology, particularly in studies evaluating treatment de-escalation or modification strategies, such as endocrine therapy (ET) switch trials in breast cancer. In disease-free patients who have completed an initial period of standard adjuvant ET, decision-making is shaped by individual, clinical, and contextual factors that may act as barriers and facilitators to trial participation. The lack of validated instruments complicates the comprehensive evaluation of these determinants. Therefore, our study aimed to develop and validate a scale for measuring barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation in adjuvant endocrine therapy switch trials (CAMBRIA-1 and EMBER-4) among breast cancer patients. Therefore, a multiphase study was undertaken: phase one focused on item generation through literature review and expert consensus; phase two assessed preliminary validity through content and face validation (S-CVI and CVR) and pre-testing (Cronbach’s alpha). The final scale encompassed 17 items and exhibited strong evidence of face and content validity (S-CVI = 0.78 and CVR > 0.725 for all items) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.874). Since preliminary internal consistency has been established, this tool may support future psychometric refinement and large-scale investigations. An understanding of these determinants may inform trial enrolment and drug development in breast cancer management, as well as tailor patient engagement strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33060361
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Tool to Assess Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Switch Trials

Emanuela Mencaglia, C. Benvenuti, Rita De Sanctis, Alberto Zambelli et al.
Current Oncology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Tool to Assess Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Switch Trials

Emanuela Mencaglia, C. Benvenuti, Rita De Sanctis, Alberto Zambelli, Cristina Arrigoni, Mariangela Gaudio, Rosario Caruso, Silvia Belloni, Paola Tiberio, Alice Silvia Brera, Flavia Jacobs, Armando Santoro, Chiara Giacon, Rosalba Torrisi
article en

Abstract

Improving accrual to clinical trials is critical in oncology, particularly in studies evaluating treatment de-escalation or modification strategies, such as endocrine therapy (ET) switch trials in breast cancer. In disease-free patients who have completed an initial period of standard adjuvant ET, decision-making is shaped by individual, clinical, and contextual factors that may act as barriers and facilitators to trial participation. The lack of validated instruments complicates the comprehensive evaluation of these determinants. Therefore, our study aimed to develop and validate a scale for measuring barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation in adjuvant endocrine therapy switch trials (CAMBRIA-1 and EMBER-4) among breast cancer patients. Therefore, a multiphase study was undertaken: phase one focused on item generation through literature review and expert consensus; phase two assessed preliminary validity through content and face validation (S-CVI and CVR) and pre-testing (Cronbach’s alpha). The final scale encompassed 17 items and exhibited strong evidence of face and content validity (S-CVI = 0.78 and CVR > 0.725 for all items) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.874). Since preliminary internal consistency has been established, this tool may support future psychometric refinement and large-scale investigations. An understanding of these determinants may inform trial enrolment and drug development in breast cancer management, as well as tailor patient engagement strategies.

Current OncologyVol. 33(6)
Humanitas University (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Pavia (IT), MultiMedica (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.