The dual-edged sword of tenure track involution: how it shapes university research and techonology transfer

This study investigates the complex effects of tenure track involution on both university research and technology transfer. While previous literature suggests that the heightened competition caused by tenure track involution primarily enhances the quantity of research at the expense of its quality, our findings challenge this notion. Using a double machine learning model on a panel dataset of 42 ‘Double First-Class’ universities in China from 2013 to 2022, our study reveals that tenure track involution significantly increased both the quantity and quality of university research output. However, this study also reveals a countervailing effect. While the tenure track involution boosts the production of technological outputs, it weakens the universities’ capacity for technology transfer. Our study identifies individualism and short-term utilitarianism as two key mediating mechanisms. The findings of our study contribute to the literature on academic careers and tenure track systems, and offer crucial insights for policymakers and university administrators seeking to balance academic excellence with broader societal impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2689069
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dual-edged sword of tenure track involution: how it shapes university research and techonology transfer

Sh. H Hu, Di Mao, Jiakeng Chen
Studies in Higher Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

The dual-edged sword of tenure track involution: how it shapes university research and techonology transfer

Sh. H Hu, Di Mao, Jiakeng Chen
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the complex effects of tenure track involution on both university research and technology transfer. While previous literature suggests that the heightened competition caused by tenure track involution primarily enhances the quantity of research at the expense of its quality, our findings challenge this notion. Using a double machine learning model on a panel dataset of 42 ‘Double First-Class’ universities in China from 2013 to 2022, our study reveals that tenure track involution significantly increased both the quantity and quality of university research output. However, this study also reveals a countervailing effect. While the tenure track involution boosts the production of technological outputs, it weakens the universities’ capacity for technology transfer. Our study identifies individualism and short-term utilitarianism as two key mediating mechanisms. The findings of our study contribute to the literature on academic careers and tenure track systems, and offer crucial insights for policymakers and university administrators seeking to balance academic excellence with broader societal impact.

Studies in Higher Education
Anhui University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Zhejiang Office of Philosophy and Social Science, Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.