Needle Types and Diagnostic Accuracy in EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy (LB) remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis that integrated both direct and indirect comparisons among various needles. Our analysis included five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 251 patients, which compared 19G fine-needle aspiration (FNA), 19G Franseen fine-needle biopsy (FNB), 19G Fork-tip FNB, 22G Franseen FNB, and 22G Fork-tip FNB. The primary outcomes focused on the total specimen length and the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs). Results were presented as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The 19G Fork-tip and 19G Franseen needles were found to be significantly superior to the others in terms of total specimen length and CPT count. No differences were observed between the 19G FNA and the 22G Franseen or Fork-tip needles. SUCRA ranking indicated that the 19G Franseen and 19G Fork-tip FNB were the top-performing needles, with SUCRA scores of 0.91 and 0.83 for specimen length, and 0.85 and 0.82 for CPTs. No severe adverse events were reported. The quality of evidence was generally considered low due to bias risk and imprecision. Conclusions: The 19G Franseen and Fork-tip FNB showed favorable results but further RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16121857
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Needle Types and Diagnostic Accuracy in EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Emad Aljahdli, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Antonio Facciorusso, Marcello Fabio Maida et al.
Diagnostics
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Needle Types and Diagnostic Accuracy in EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Emad Aljahdli, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Antonio Facciorusso, Marcello Fabio Maida, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Eyad Gadour, Elisa Stasi, Mattia Brigida, Gianfranco Donatelli, Mohammed Albeshir, Armando Dell’Anna, M Alqahtani
article en

Abstract

Background: The optimal needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy (LB) remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis that integrated both direct and indirect comparisons among various needles. Our analysis included five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 251 patients, which compared 19G fine-needle aspiration (FNA), 19G Franseen fine-needle biopsy (FNB), 19G Fork-tip FNB, 22G Franseen FNB, and 22G Fork-tip FNB. The primary outcomes focused on the total specimen length and the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs). Results were presented as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The 19G Fork-tip and 19G Franseen needles were found to be significantly superior to the others in terms of total specimen length and CPT count. No differences were observed between the 19G FNA and the 22G Franseen or Fork-tip needles. SUCRA ranking indicated that the 19G Franseen and 19G Fork-tip FNB were the top-performing needles, with SUCRA scores of 0.91 and 0.83 for specimen length, and 0.85 and 0.82 for CPTs. No severe adverse events were reported. The quality of evidence was generally considered low due to bias risk and imprecision. Conclusions: The 19G Franseen and Fork-tip FNB showed favorable results but further RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(12)
University of Verona (IT), University of Salento (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), King Fahad Specialist Hospital (SA), IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (IT), Ramsay Santé Hôpital privé des Peupliers (FR), Générale de Santé (FR), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.